Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 17, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 5 of 26  <br />  <br />year after removal. Staff, however, does question the in-kind nature of the replacement since it appears <br />the stair of the west patio is intended to be built lakeward of the extent of the pre-existing porch. <br /> <br />It also appears that the elevated west patio will extend into the area of pre-existing on-grade patio. As this <br />and the east patio are to be elevated above grade with decorative walls and/or corner posts, it would be <br />considered an expansion of a nonconformity. There is also a portion of the stair on the west patio that is <br />entirely outside any previously existing hardcover or structure and would be considered new structure. <br /> <br />As it relates to the east patio, the submitted plans show a 3’ x 8’ stair toward the lake on the eastern deck <br />which is not shown on the survey. Staff would discourage the further expansion of either patio area, <br />particularly toward the lake. During Staff’s inspection of the property, there was too much snow cover to <br />determine the extent of the patios. The photos taken by Staff of the property show that the short walls and <br />corner posts have not yet been constructed. The applicant should clarify the state of the various elements <br />of this project. <br /> <br />The property owner to the west has submitted comments and photographs. <br /> <br />Staff recommends after-the-fact approval of the conditional use permit and setback and hardcover <br />variances for two elevated patios, a new paver sidewalk, and installation of two rain gardens with the <br />following conditions: <br /> <br />1. The City Engineer’s recommendations should be followed. Curtis noted the applicant <br /> submitted a stormwater pollution prevention plan today. <br /> <br />2. The west patio should be limited to the extent of the previously existing porch footprint and not <br /> expand lakeward or into the area of the previous on-grade patio. <br /> <br />3. The west patio should be screened with vegetation on the west and south sides to screen the <br /> structure from views from the lake. <br /> <br />4. The east patio should not be permitted to expand closer to the lake than the previously existing <br /> deck. <br /> <br />5. The east patio should be screened with vegetation as much as feasible on the south side to screen <br /> the structure from views from the lake. <br /> <br />6. The eastern rain garden should be revised to meet the required 5-foot grading setback from the <br /> property line. <br /> <br />7. Corrected hardcover calculations should be submitted with the administrative permit application <br /> reflecting hardcover within and outside the 75-foot setback. Currently the numbers are <br /> combined. <br /> <br />8. An after-the-fact administrative permit is required for each of the elements of the project. <br /> <br />The Planning Commissioners had no questions for Staff. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 04/21/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 03/17/2014 <br />[Page 5 of 26]