Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, March 17, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 12 of 26  <br />  <br />John Daly, Revisions, LLC, was present. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting an average lakeshore setback variance in order to conduct <br />improvements to the existing home and roofline ahead of the average lakeshore setback. The property <br />owners are currently undergoing an interior remodel of the home and the builder is requesting approval of <br />the setback variance to allow for primarily cosmetic improvements to the roof of the existing home on the <br />property. <br /> <br />Due to the configuration of the lakeshore and the neighboring homes, the existing home is situated almost <br />entirely ahead of the average lakeshore setback line. Since the property to the west is vacant, the average <br />lakeshore setback line for the subject property is somewhat assumed. The applicants have also proposed <br />to remove the east lake-facing deck and construct a new deck with a screen porch and chimney facing the <br />lake on the east side of the home ahead of the average lakeshore setback line. The proposed <br />improvements to the home will be conforming with respect to all zoning district and lake setbacks, height, <br />structural coverage, and hardcover limitations with the exception of the average lakeshore setback. <br /> <br />The majority of the new roof with proposed screen porch and deck will be constructed entirely ahead of <br />the average lakeshore setback line. The applicant has provided illustrations which highlight the proposed <br />changes to the roof and the home. Portions of the roof will be raised above existing by two feet. The new <br />deck will replace an existing deck which extends approximately two feet closer to the lake. The proposed <br />screen porch will meet the required 30-foot side setback from the east property line but will be considered <br />new structure ahead of the average setback line. A 30-foot tall chimney is also proposed to serve the <br />fireplace to be installed in the screen porch on the east side. <br /> <br />Due to the orientation of the lakeshore, the subject property functions as though it is a peninsula. The <br />existing home is located almost entirely ahead of the average lakeshore setback line based on the existing <br />home to the east and an estimated conforming location of a future home on the vacant lot to the west. <br />Even with the nonconforming location of the previous home on the vacant lot to the west, the subject <br />home is well ahead of the average lakeshore setback line and the home to the east is located well to the <br />north of the subject home. <br /> <br />It does not appear the views of the lake from the home to the east will be adversely impacted by the <br />applicants’ proposed changes to the roof. There is a significant amount of tree vegetation between that <br />property and the subject property. The proposed screen porch, chimney and new deck may be visible <br />from the property to the east, however, as that home appears to be primarily situated to face toward the <br />southeast and does not have significant windows facing the lake over the subject project. Based on the <br />shape and orientation of the vacant lot, it is reasonable to assume that a new residence will orient toward <br />the lake and not over the subject property. <br /> <br />Staff has not received any public comments regarding the request. Staff finds there is a practical <br />difficulty in the shape and orientation of the property and lakeshore. In addition, the orientation of the <br />adjacent lots toward the lake and the existing trees on the applicants and neighbor’s property help ensure <br />that the views of the lake enjoyed by the neighbors will not be significantly impacted by the proposed <br />screen porch with chimney, new deck, and changes to the shape and height of the roof. <br /> <br />If the Planning Commission finds practical difficulties exist justifying the requested variances, a <br />recommendation of approval of the average lakeshore setback variance would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 04/21/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 03/17/2014 <br />[Page 12 of 26]