My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-16-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
06-16-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:40:46 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 2:08:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 19, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 12 of 31 <br /> <br />5. In conjunction with the green space noted above, installation of stormwater management systems <br /> such as swales, rain gardens, et cetera, should be incorporated into the green spaces to allow for <br /> filtration of runoff and sediment/debris containment. <br /> <br />6. Separation of parking from the traveled right-of-way of County Road 15, preferably with the <br /> landscaping of some sort. <br /> <br />The site plan submitted by the applicant accomplishes some of the above goals but does not address <br />others. Site access is consolidated into one curb cut at the approximate location of the existing access <br />serving the main marina building. The internal circulation of the site allows for a continuous loop but the <br />parking stalls are substandard at 18’ x 9’ rather than the required 20’ x 9’. Gaffron noted this is likely due <br />to the fact that there is not sufficient room between County Road 15 and the lake to provide for standard <br />depth stalls while maintaining a 24-foot drivable corridor between opposing stalls as well as required <br />landscaping along County Road 15 and along the lakeshore. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the proposed parking does meet the required 10-foot setback from the adjacent residential <br />property. Whether ten feet is sufficient to allow for adequate landscaping and screening to the adjacent <br />residential property is worthy of discussion. <br /> <br />As it relates to the rules of the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District, the number of boat units allowed <br />for marinas has historically been based on shoreline length and the two residential zoned properties have <br />historically been included in the countable shoreline for the marina. <br /> <br />In addition, the southerly Tanager Lake dock system for this marina has extended outside the allowed <br />dock use area for a number of years based on extended lot lines. Both dock systems on Tanager are <br />currently non-compliant. Because 1440 and 1442 are zoned residential, LMCD rules require extra side <br />setbacks for slips that open toward residential property. The applicants have submitted a revised dock <br />proposal that would maintain a 56-foot setback to the zoning boundary if the rezoning occurs. The down <br />side to this is that it would potentially result in additional boat traffic in front of the residential property at <br />1432. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the proposal does not meet the required 10-foot lakeshore landscaping requirement, which <br />in turn does not provide for the desired stormwater management facilities which potentially could be <br />parallel to the shoreline. The proposal does provide landscaping and separation between County Road 15 <br />and the parking areas. The right-of-way for the 1440 and 1442 parcels is reduced, allowing for greater <br />separation between the road and parking. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission should review the request for rezoning, hold the public hearing and accept <br />public comments. The Planning Commission should consider whether acceptance and adherence to the <br />conceptual site plan is critical to a rezoning decision and the expected, potential, and unanticipated <br />impacts of rezoning in attempting to reach a recommendation to the City Council. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked if the rezoning could be joined with possible improvements on the marina site. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he had a discussion with the City Attorney as to whether a rezoning is possible and he <br />indicated it is something the City generally should not do. The City Attorney did state that at the time the <br />City is looking at a site plan, a rezoning, and a comprehensive plan amendment, one of the options is to <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 06/16/2014 <br />Aproval of Planning Commission Minutes 05/19/2014 <br />[Page 12 of 31]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.