Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, June 16, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 10 of 18  <br />  <br />Gaffron stated there needs to be the correct sequence but that what the Planning Commission is motioning <br />tonight is to have the City Council authorize the Planning Commission to look at studying the creation of <br />a B-2 subdistrict. Gaffron stated if the City Council does not authorize the Planning Commission to <br />proceed forward with studying the creation of a B-2 subdistrict, the Planning Commission would need to <br />vote on whether the property should be zoned to a straight B-2 district. <br /> <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted this application will be on the City Council’s agenda for June 23. <br /> <br />3. #14-3672 REVOLUTION DESIGN AND BUILD ON BEHALF OF KELLY AND <br />MELODEE MARX, 3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE, VARIANCE, 7:35 P.M. – 7:47 P.M. <br /> <br />Sid Levin, Applicant, was present. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the applicant is requesting a lake setback variance in order to construct a second-story <br />addition over a portion of the existing home and an attic area above the garage within 75 feet of Lake <br />Minnetonka due to the lagoon. The home is located approximately 50 feet from the lagoon and is <br />considered a legal nonconforming structure with respect to the lake setback. The home was constructed <br />in 1973, prior to establishment of the City’s current zoning code requirement for a 75-foot structural <br />setback from the lake. Over the years modifications have been made to the property through variances <br />and other city approvals. <br /> <br />A screen porch is also proposed to be constructed under the existing above-grade deck. The addition of <br />the screen porch is not considered an expansion of a non-conformity as the deck is currently considered <br />an above-grade structure. The increased mass of the addition will be screened by the existing vegetation <br />along North Shore Drive and will be relatively hidden from views from neighboring properties due to the <br />existing vegetation and orientation of the neighboring homes. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the proposed project will result in additional massing within allowed levels but the applicant <br />is not proposing to increase the structural coverage level. The overall hardcover level for the property is <br />conforming at 19.3 percent. However, approximately 3,000 square feet of structural hardcover exists <br />within 75 feet of the lake. The applicant is not proposing an increase in hardcover. <br /> <br />Staff finds that the 75-foot lake setback variance to allow construction of the addition appears to be <br />reasonable and consistent with similar residential properties in the area. The existing orientation of the <br />adjacent and subject homes as well as vegetation on the property should serve to address or mitigate any <br />negative visual impacts. <br /> <br />The additions appear to be reasonable and consistent with similar residential properties in the area. The <br />proposed additions are conforming with respect to structural coverage, overall hardcover and massing <br />regulations. The creation of the additional square footage within the home’s existing footprint will not be <br />a detriment to neighboring properties, nor will the addition impact the light, air and open space of the <br />location. The existing home’s proximity to the lagoon and the orientation of the home serve as a practical <br />difficulty to constructing a conforming living space addition. <br /> <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the setback variance to permit construction of a second story over <br />a portion of the existing home and attic over the garage within 75 feet of the OHWL. The Planning <br />Item #03 - PC Agenda - 07/21/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 06/16/14 [Page 10 of 18]