My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08-18-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:49:10 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:55:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 21, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 4 of 30 <br /> <br />still reviewing and will continue reviewing the work more from a global standpoint. Curtis stated if the <br />work does not require engineering, there is not a regulation that Staff requires it. <br /> <br />Landgraver commented the Planning Commission could still recommend an engineer review the work to <br />the applicant. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated the applicants can choose to ignore the engineering <br /> <br />Thiesse noted there are four tiers shown on Exhibit B and that it appears the walls will be 58 feet in <br />length. Thiesse stated in his view the walls are ten feet short and that they should go another 27 feet into <br />the yard in order to make a wall like this work without it being engineered. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked if Mr. Briggs is opposed to obtaining engineering for the slope. <br /> <br />Briggs stated he is willing to do whatever it takes to work with the City but that he would prefer not to <br />incur the additional expense of hiring an engineer. Briggs stated he already has incurred a number of <br />expenses. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if the Planning Commission is being asked to approve something that they are not <br />reviewing tonight or whether the Planning Commission is being asked to provide direction at this time, <br />with the application coming back before the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated the Planning Commission has seen only one plan, which is not sufficient to accomplish <br />what needs to be done. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if this would still need to go through the permitting process of the Minnehaha Creek <br />Watershed District. <br /> <br />Curtis stated there is some level of permitting with the Watershed District that is required and then the <br />City will also issue an administrative permit, which is the point at which all the plans are required to be <br />submitted. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if what is being requested of the Planning Commission is the conditional use permit to <br />allow for the grading on the site and not necessarily the permit for the specific solutions. <br /> <br />Curtis stated this is a repair and that the property owners are attempting to put their lakeshore back <br />together. Curtis indicated the Planning Commission is able to request additional information, but in order <br />to expedite the matter and have the slope repaired this year, Staff would prefer not to hold the applicants <br />up another month. <br /> <br />Thiesse indicated he would be in agreement with that. <br /> <br />Lemke noted the slope has been in this condition for the past year. <br /> <br />Schwingler stated the failure is now affecting the adjoining property. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 08/18/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes <br />[Page 4 of 30]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.