My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-18-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2014
>
08-18-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 11:49:10 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:55:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
443
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 21, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 30 <br /> <br />Curtis stated a conditional use permit is required for both properties since the proposed work exceeds ten <br />cubic yards in the 0-75 foot zone. Retaining walls and boulders added for support will require approval <br />of hardcover variances. <br /> <br />The submitted plan by Mr. Briggs results in approximately 700 square feet of hardcover, which consists <br />of primarily walls within the 0-75 foot zone. Mr. Briggs has indicated his desire to reduce the visual <br />impact of these walls with some vegetative screening. A landscape plan will be required to offer a <br />natural-looking lakeshore and screening for the walls. City Code does require that a conditional use <br />permit is issued prior to engaging in any activities to fill, elevate or alter the existing grade. Conditionally <br />permitted uses must be reviewed using the criteria found in Section 78-916. The proposed work is <br />intended to repair and restore failures of the slope not caused by the actions of the property owners. <br /> <br />Staff finds that the conditional use permit for the restorative grading, planting and installation of retaining <br />walls within the 0-75 foot zone appears to be reasonable and consistent with similar properties in the <br />neighborhood and the landscape plan offers a natural looking slope. Approval is also necessary in order <br />to repair/restore the areas of failure and stop any sediment from entering the lake. <br /> <br />The City’s Consulting Engineer has conducted an initial review of Mr. Briggs’ plans and has provided <br />comments that are included in the Planning Commission’s packets. The City Engineer has also had <br />discussions with Sundstrom/Olausen regarding their plans and no significant concerns have been noted at <br />this time. A full engineering review will be conducted at the time of the administrative permits for <br />construction on both properties. <br /> <br />Curtis stated both applicants should consider providing a detailed landscape plan to the City. An estimate <br />of the necessary hardcover has been provided by Mr. Briggs’ wall contractor. The City expects a similar <br />estimate when the plan for the Sundstrom/Olausen property is further developed. Only the minimal <br />necessary hardcover to support the restoration should be installed. <br /> <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the hardcover variances and conditional use permits in order to <br />conduct the earth work within the 0-75 foot setback area to conduct the restorations; construct the <br />retaining walls; and implement appropriate landscape screening as indicated. As-built surveys and <br />hardcover calculations reflecting the as-built conditions and hardcover amounts within the 0-75 foot zone <br />should be submitted for both properties following completion of the work. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if the conditional use permit is for both property owners. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated there would be separate conditional use permits needed for both property owners and <br />approval of the application would cover both properties. A resolution for each individual property would <br />be drafted by Staff for approval. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if the Sundstrom conditional use permit would be covered in any approvals tonight. <br /> <br />Curtis stated that is the intent and further engineering oversight will be required once a plan is submitted. <br />The purpose tonight would be to hold the public hearing and provide any input the Planning Commission <br />feels is necessary. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked if there would be two separate applications at the time they go before the City Council. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 08/18/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes <br />[Page 2 of 30]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.