Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, July 21, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 7 of 30  <br />  <br />The applicants had nothing further to add to Staff’s report. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. <br /> <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 6:56 p.m. <br /> <br />Leskinen noted the Planning Commission had thoroughly reviewed this application earlier this year and <br />that her only question relating to the application was regarding the reconfiguration of the deck. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit commented he would almost characterize the application as a housekeeping matter. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated the Planning Commission is not interfering with the intent of the average lakeshore setback <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Leskinen noted there are no views that will be obscured as a result of this project. <br /> <br />Schwingler moved, McGrann seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 14-3655 Joe <br />and Donelle Feldmann, 805 Forest Arms Lane, granting of an average lakeshore setback variance. <br />VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br /> <br />4. #14-3675 RYAN AND STACY ALNESS, XXX ELMWOOD AVENUE/PID 07-117-23-11- <br />0027, VARIANCES, 6:58 P.M. – 8:15 P.M. <br /> <br />Ryan and Stacy Alness, Applicants, were present. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated in front of the Planning Commission are some additional items that were submitted today <br />and late Friday, including the practical difficulty document, a letter from the adjoining residents, and also <br />a letter from Glen Soley, another nearby neighbor. Gaffron noted the notification process for the hearing <br />tonight was slightly flawed in that the applicants provided a plat map and property owner list that only <br />reflected their property along North Arm Drive and did not reflect the lakeshore lot. Those neighbors <br />received notice of the hearing over the weekend. The City Attorney has suggested that is not something <br />that will void this process. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the applicants are requesting approval for an average lakeshore setback variance and a <br />structure height variance to allow construction of a residence on the substandard vacant lot. The lot is <br />located on the lake. Currently that lot is subject to a Special Lot Combination Agreement which ties it to <br />the applicants’ off lake property. For purposes of the review tonight, Staff will be looking at the variance <br />application as if the Special Lot Combination Agreement is not in effect. <br /> <br />The applicants’ request for subdivision approval to separate this lakeshore parcel from their off-lake <br />parcel was denied last fall. The applicants subsequently filed a lawsuit asking the Court to compel the <br />City to terminate the Special Lot Combination Agreement. The lawsuit is on hold by agreement between <br />the City and the applicants in order to determine what variances might be needed to construct on that lot. <br />The Planning Commission is tasked tonight to make recommendations on whether there are sufficient <br />practical difficulties to support the variances being requested. Gaffron stated while the lot is functionally <br />not buildable unless an average setback variance is approved, Staff does not support the height variance. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 08/18/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes <br />[Page 7 of 30]