My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
09-15-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 12:24:05 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:43:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 18, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 30 of 33 <br /> <br />Jensen stated a determination has not been made yet on the health of the trees and what trees would be <br />worth saving. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if they would all be single-family units. <br /> <br />Jensen indicated it would be a townhome community but single families would be occupying them. <br /> <br />Lemke asked what the anticipated cost would be for a unit. <br /> <br />Jensen stated it would likely be four plus based on the square footage. Jensen stated a typical apartment <br />building would limit the amount of rent that could be charged. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked how the Metropolitan Council will feel about the lower density. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated Staff has not explored what the Metropolitan Council’s feelings would be with a lower <br />density. Gaffron stated he doubts that Metropolitan Council will be opposed to the slightly lower density. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated he likes the plan but that he has a concern with what the Metropolitan Council will say <br />about the density. <br /> <br />Jensen stated in his view the proposed density for the site is very reasonable. Jensen stated they anticipate <br />sewer and water would also be installed for the property to the north at the same time as this property and <br />that it may make sense to increase density slightly on that site. <br /> <br />Harrison stated they are asking the City to endorse what they are proposing and then they would approach <br />the Metropolitan Council. <br /> <br />Jensen stated they would like to hear the thoughts of the Planning Commission and the City Council and <br />that they have a number of items from Staff that would still need to be addressed. <br /> <br />McGrann stated he likes the concept and that it is attractive. McGrann stated as long as the Metropolitan <br />Council agrees with the density, it is an attractive development. <br /> <br />Lemke asked if any market research has been done on whether the units will sell. <br /> <br />Curt Ferth indicated they have not done any formal market research for this particular development but <br />they have first-hand experience doing similar developments in a number of other communities and it has <br />proven to be quite popular. <br /> <br />Harrison stated he has been doing a number of similar projects for other builders in the area and that it is a <br />very strong market at different price points. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked what the apple orchard is guided for. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated the orchard is guided for seven to ten units with a mix of single-family and multi- <br />family house. The orchard area was part of the Conservation Design Study back in 2005-2006, and the <br />result of that study was that some low density should be done in that area, which was not followed since <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 09/15/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes <br />[Page 30 of 33]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.