My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-15-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
2014
>
09-15-2014 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/21/2018 12:24:05 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:43:10 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
422
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, August 18, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 19 of 33 <br /> <br />Curtis stated both neighbors have commented positively on the proposal prior to the 5-foot extension <br />proposed tonight and that she would recommend the applicants obtain a new comment form from the <br />neighbors prior to the City Council meeting. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated based on the aerial and the tree line, she does not have any problem with the proposal. <br /> <br />McGrann moved, Lemke seconded, to recommend approval of Application No. 14-3678, <br />Architectural Landscape Design on behalf of Bret and Jennifer Riemenschneider, 835 Forest Arms <br />Lane, granting of an average lakeshore setback variance with the possible additional 5-foot <br />extension of the deck, with the applicants updating the neighbors’ comments prior to the City <br />Council meeting per Staff recommendation. VOTE: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br /> <br />8. #14-3679 THOMAS AND KATHERINE ZIEGLER, 2264 SHADYWOOD ROAD, <br />VARIANCE, 8:12 P.M. – 8:47 P.M. <br /> <br />Thomas and Katherine Ziegler, Applicants, were present. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the applicants are requesting a 3-foot side street setback variance and a 242 square foot <br />structural coverage variance in order to construct a 6’ x 24’ addition to the rear of the existing home and a <br />12’ x 12’ shed in the rear yard. Both additions are proposed to have two levels. The addition is proposed <br />to be in line with the existing garage, and a variance to allow continuation of the existing nonconforming <br />setback 12 feet from the side street property line of Crystal Bay Road where a 15-foot setback is required <br />is also being requested. The proposed shed will meet setbacks. <br /> <br />The applicants’ current structural coverage level is 14.6 percent, which is 47.5 feet under the allowed <br />structural coverage level. The addition and the proposed shed result in 16.9 percent structural coverage <br />where 15 percent is allowed. The applicants have based their proposal of 2,071 square feet of structural <br />coverage on the total lot area which includes a road right-of-way. The right-of-way adds 1,700 square <br />feet to the lot area. Curtis stated typically the City bases lot area on the property boundaries and subtracts <br />areas of dedicated right-of-way. <br /> <br />The applicants have proposed to construct the 6-foot addition in the same footprint. The variance in 2008 <br />included the setback from the road and the applicants are looking to continue that for consistency. The <br />plan for the shed includes grading and retaining walls which will likely result in the removal of many <br />mature trees in the rear yard. Staff also notes the proposed retaining wall extends right up to the side <br />property line where a 5-foot setback is required. If approved, the wall plan should be revised. <br /> <br />Staff does not find practical difficulties supporting the structural coverage variance to allow the shed. <br />However, the many mature trees on the site will serve to screen additional structural improvements to the <br />home if the Planning Commission finds there are practical difficulties supporting the structural coverage <br />variance and the side street setback variances for the 145 square foot home addition. <br /> <br />If the Planning Commission finds practical difficulties exist which support the granting of a side street <br />setback variance and structural coverage variance, Staff recommends making a motion recommending <br />approval of the side street and structural coverage variances allowing the addition to the home, and the <br />following conditions should be considered: <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 09/15/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes <br />[Page 19 of 33]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.