Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, September 15, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 3 of 59  <br />  <br />property which appears to be out of character with the surrounding area. The applicants’ landscape plan <br />does not adequately address lost trees and overall vegetation cleared from the site. <br /> <br />Curtis stated the proposed use of the property as a residential property will not be changing as a result of <br />the proposed grading activity and there should be no change in the use and enjoyment of adjacent <br />properties. The proposed grading on this lot should be designed to minimize any environmental impacts. <br />Much of the grading activity has already been conducted. This activity may have resulted in the current <br />or future loss of mature vegetation on the property. The applicants have provided a landscape plan but <br />additional lakeshore buffer areas may be necessary as well as some screening vegetation from the lake <br />and neighboring properties. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission should read the correspondence from the neighbor that was included within <br />the Staff report. The neighbor also is present at tonight’s meeting. <br /> <br />Planning Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for the land alterations within the 75- <br />foot setback area conditioned upon the following: <br /> <br />1. A revised grading plan should be submitted to address all requirements of the City Engineer; <br /> <br />2. A revised landscape plan should be submitted which provides for replacement o the two <br /> additional trees removed, increased vegetative screening from neighboring properties, and a 10- <br /> foot to 15-foot lakeshore planting buffer; <br /> <br />3. Conformance with the City Engineer’s comments will be required. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission had no questions for Staff. <br /> <br />Jim Kelly, Applicant, stated this is a house they intend to either remodel or rebuild at some point in the <br />future. Kelly indicated the first 75 feet of the lot was all weeds, poison ivy and a bee problem. Kelly <br />stated when they purchased the property, they did not realize they needed a permit in order to smooth out <br />the grade and put down sod. Kelly indicated they did not want to spend a lot of money on the project and <br />that it was basically just a sod and irrigation project. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 10/20/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 09/15/2014 <br />[Page 3 of 59]