Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 20, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 24 of 28  <br />  <br />recommendation. If the applicant applies for and is denied a direct access by the County, that issue would <br />need to be revisited and, if need be, a shared driveway could be accommodated but that the vegetation in <br />that area would be disturbed. Curtis stated she would recommend the Planning Commission proceed as <br />proposed. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if the City has only acquired the ability for a trail in one location so far. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated Bayside Meadows has a 50-foot segment. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated given the location of the Luce Line, this area has a pretty low priority for a trail and that he <br />does not see a big opportunity for other developments along Bayside Road near this property. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the City is looking at approximately $3.5 million to create the trails as outlined in the <br />Comprehensive Plan and that it is not likely there will be a trail in this area for the foreseeable future. <br /> <br />Mack noted the proposed 2040 bike plan is open for public comment through December 6 and that this <br />county road is not shown as a proposed trail as part of that plan. Mack stated in his view Commissioner <br />Thiesse’s comment is right on the mark about the proximity to the Luce Line Trail. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated as long as this is a new development, the City should obtain an easement since the <br />Comprehensive Plan identifies it. <br /> <br />Lemke indicated he is neutral on that. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked what level of direction is required in regards to the Conservation Design. Leskinen asked <br />if the Planning Commission should identify areas they would like to see preserved within that area. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated the Planning Commission can identify different things if they would like Staff to make a <br />note of that. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if it is for both properties. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it would be for the entire 10-acre piece. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if the house would remain. <br /> <br />Curtis indicated it will. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit stated if the City does not collect an easement on this development, it may set a bad precedent <br />going into the future. Schoenzeit stated in his view trails are valuable and that the City has an obligation <br />to collect them in order to be consistent. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated she would preserve as many trees as possible as part of the Conservation Design but that <br />this is a relatively small parcel in the front and that there does not to be much in the back that will be <br />disrupted. Leskinen stated in her view this is a pretty straight forward application. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated there will not be a lot to salvage on the lot given the septic sites and the wetlands. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 11/17/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 10/20/2014 <br />[Page 24 of 28]