Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, October 20, 2014 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 15 of 28  <br />  <br />Nash stated their storm water management requires that and the water quality should be improved with <br />the biofiltration systems that are being installed. Nash stated essentially the site currently has no <br />treatment before it leaves the site and so from that standpoint it will improve. Nash stated in addition the <br />Watershed District has indicated they want to monitor how much the water quality will be improved and <br />have installed a monitoring system on the culvert located on the south side of the road to see how much it <br />does improve. Nash noted they have to improve it under the rules. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked if there is a number of BMPs that they have to meet to improve that. <br /> <br />Nash stated they have to submit a full storm water management report that will be reviewed by the City <br />and the Watershed District that will spell that out. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated she is going to pull away from the water issues for a while and talk about some of the <br />other aspects of the project. Leskinen stated in her view the developer has made great strides on the <br />development and that the privately owned space is a great idea. Leskinen stated in her view there has <br />been good collaboration with the neighbors and the homeowners association. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated with regard to the requirement for the boulevard trees, she would be in favor of asking the <br />Council to grant some flexibility on that. Leskinen noted the City saw an application not so very long ago <br />where they did not want the contrived look of a tree every 40 feet along the boulevard and that she would <br />like to recommend to the City Council to grant some flexibility with that. Leskinen stated the number of <br />trees being planted would likely not be reduced but that the trees could perhaps be located elsewhere. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated she also likes the idea of a conservation area surrounding the site since that will help keep <br />the development more natural looking. Leskinen stated maintenance of any septic systems in the <br />conservation areas will need to be spelled out and that she would suggest the Planning Commission make <br />that recommendation as well. <br /> <br />Leskinen stated continued attention to onsite storm water management and water management would also <br />be in her recommendations. <br /> <br />McGrann stated he is in agreement that the developer has been very thoughtful about the neighbors’ <br />concerns and that the private ownership of the public space is a great idea. McGrann stated he is not sure <br />it has to be a destination park and that no parking might prevent attracting others to the area, particularly <br />in light of the fact that the homeowners associations will be involved in the ownership of it. <br /> <br />McGrann stated in his view the City need to have something to show that they are putting in more trees <br />throughout the development or in the public space than what are being removed. McGrann stated he also <br />agrees that the drain tiles is an issue that needs to be addressed and that it might be more appropriate to <br />address it on a site-by-site basis. <br /> <br />Schwingler stated he does not have much more to add to what has already been stated. Schwingler noted <br />attempting to identify the drain tile up front would delay the project and that it can be handled on a site- <br />by-site basis. Schwingler stated he wants Staff to ensure that the water drainage off of Lots 16 and 17 is <br />addressed. <br /> <br />Schwingler stated in his view a housing development versus a golf course will be an improvement to the <br />lake and that overall the development is a great community project that is coming together based on how <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 11/17/2014 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes 10/20/2014 <br />[Page 15 of 28]