Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> SPECIAL ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,January 6,2014 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (l. #13-3638 and#13-3639 SOURCE LAND CAPITAL, LLC(PAT HILLER) O/B/O GRAl�'T <br /> WENKSTERIV(LAKEVIEW GOLF), 405 NORTH ARM DRIVE—COMPREHENSIVE <br /> PLAl�'AMENDMENT AND SKETCH PLAN REVIEW, Continued) <br /> McMillan stated according to a 1995 state statute, the City is required to do some housekeeping and <br /> reconcile that difference, which is where the City is at tonight. McMillan noted the application in front of <br /> them creates a strict 120-day time frame in which to make this decision. Given the past history and <br /> information that has been provided,McMillan indicated she will be voting in favor of amending the <br /> Comprehensive Plan. McMillan stated the reasons she sees for approving this include the long-term <br /> history of this property being seen as a residential property,the fact that two-acre residential zoninb <br /> continues to be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood, the fact that there exists adequate capacity <br /> on this site for stormwater control, and that there will be traffic and buffering requirements that will be <br /> required to be met as part of this development. In addition,the applicant will need to obtain proper <br /> permits for septic and wells and the two-acre density will not overburden the City's public safety <br /> capacity. <br /> McMillan stated although this property has been open space for a number of years and that she feels <br /> empathy for the neighbors that would lose the open space, this property does not have any unique natural <br /> resources. McMillan stated it is a golf course and golf courses are not necessarily a unique natural <br /> resource unlike 140 acres of woods or a particular lakeshore property that might serve a benefit as far as a <br /> public beach or that type of amenity. McMillan stated she does recognize and appreciate the concern <br /> about the open space, but noted there are no natural resources issues on this property that would make the <br /> City think this is something they should keep and possibly compensate the property owner for. <br /> McMillan noted there was no formal process that was undertaken by the City in guiding this property as <br /> open space under the Comprehensive Plan, which is important to take into consideration. McMillan <br /> stated if the City is thinking of changing the zoning of a particular property,there needs to be a process <br /> where the property owner is notified and brought before the City Council to discuss that change. <br /> McMillan stated there was not a thorough examination conducted by the City about changinb private <br /> open space to public park land under the recent Comprehensive Plan, including possible ramifications to <br /> the City or the property owner. <br /> McMillan stated in her view it is important that private property rights are respected, which is good <br /> government. McMillan indicated she did not really understand the Comprehensive Plan until she became <br /> a council member and that it is a plannin�document that through the years has gained more and more <br /> significance. When the first comprehensive plan was developed in the 1970s, it was considered more as a <br /> broad philosophical plan. Throuah the years it has evolved into more micro-managing of individual sites <br /> and density, especially as it relates to city sewer capacity. McMillan stated the basic philosophy of the <br /> City's Comprehensive Plan is terrific but the City has had some struggles implementing it over the <br /> decades in regards to what the City desires and what the Metropolitan Council would like the City to be. <br /> __ _ __ -_ _ <br /> Page 21 of 27 <br /> __ __ ___ _ __ <br />