My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 4:44:55 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:13:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� � <br /> Lemke noted the garage addition is encroaching almost five feet into the 30-foot setback and also into the <br /> 75-foot setback, which makes it unacceptable on two different levels. <br /> Schoenzeit stated there is a substantial amount of house footprint that could be converted into a garage if <br /> so desired. <br /> Thiesse noted cost is not considered a practical difficulty. <br /> McGrann asked if the applicant would need a variance to e�pand his use into the easement. <br /> Curtis indicated they would since they currently exceed the amount of allowablehardcover within the 0- <br /> 75 foot zone. The property currently contains 11 pereent total hardcover and the-�applicant can widen the <br /> driveway to some extent, but that he would not be able to widen the drivewa��very much,on#he east side. <br /> McGrann asked if the applicant could apply for additional hardcover:: <br /> Curtis indicated he could. <br /> Thiesse asked if that would just require a permit <br /> Curtis indicated it would require a permit for the hardcover outside the 75-foot area. <br /> Gaffron noted Staff has also not seen the language contained i���he�easement to know what would be <br /> allowed. <br /> Landgraver stated the Planning Commission should take note of the fact that they had previously <br /> recommended six feet,which should be taken into consideration, but that they need to take into <br /> consideration the neighbor's concert�s and the increased eneroachment. <br /> Schoenzeit stated an attached two-ear garage that is functional is reasonable use of the property and not <br /> having a two-car garage�is a practical difficulYy here in Minnesota. <br /> Landgraver stated the Delaneys have been pretty eonsistent about conveying their concerns with the <br /> appGcation and that the applicant has made attempts to comply with the direction of the Planning <br /> Commission. Landgraver noted the applicant could plant a row of evergreens along the property line, <br /> which wouid block the neighbor's view�, and that he is inclined to grant the 6-foot variance. <br /> McGrann commented there are no easy answers, but that he would be in favor of the six feet. McGrann <br /> indicated he would have some serious issues if the applicant comes baek with a request to expand the <br /> hardcovcr. which would increase the amount of outside parking and would be closer to the Delaney <br /> property. <br /> Curtis noted the Delaneys would need to consent to any expansion of hardcover in the easement area. <br /> Lemke stated given the objections of the neighbor, he would not be in support of the expansion. <br /> (Jon Schwingler arrives at 6:58 pm.) <br /> Schoenzeit moved,McGrann seconded,to recommend approval of Application No. 13-3636,Lixiao <br /> Wang,3059 Farview Lane,granting of a 6-foot addition to the garage without the deck on top,and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.