My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 4:44:55 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:13:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,November 18,2013 <br /> 6:30 dclock p.m. <br /> Landgraver stated it sounds like the Planning Commission would support a small addition but not the nine <br /> feet being proposed by the applicant. Landgraver noted if the application is denied,the applicant can still <br /> go before the City Council. <br /> Leskinen stated in her view tabling is not an option and that the Planninb Commission should entertain a <br /> motion. Leskinen stated it does not appear the Planning Commission is will'ing to approve anything over <br /> six feet. <br /> Curtis stated if the Planning Commission is general ly favorable of the 6-foat addition,that,�iirection could <br /> again be given to the applicant. <br /> Thiesse stated he would like the applicant to have a useable garage and that a 24-foot garage is useable in <br /> his view. Thiesse stated he is not convinced that l 6 feet is��not enough for a sedan and that in his view the <br /> third stall for that type of vehicle may be sufficient. Thiesse stated if the applicant can prove differently, <br /> he would be willing to reconsider the application. <br /> Leskinen reiterated her position has not chanbed from last time and that she agrees a reasonable garage is <br /> 24 feet. <br /> Thiesse noted the neighbars are also opposed to the proposal, which does�not help. <br /> Landgraver moved,McGrann seconded, to recommend denial of Application 3059 Farview Lane, <br /> with the stipulation that the specific request for nine feet is denied and that the Planning <br /> Commission would recommeud six feet. VOTE: Ayes 5,Nays 0. <br /> W BUSINESS <br /> 3. #13-3637 WILLIAM ABBOTT,2350 WATERTOWN ROAD, SUBDIVISION, 6:4 . .— <br /> 8:17 P. <br /> William Abbo pplicant,was prescnt. <br /> Gaffron stated the ap � ant is requestin��preliminary plat approval f seven lot single-family <br /> residential subdivision to known as Oliver Hill as well as rez � g to Residential Planned Unit <br /> Development. The property zoned RR-1B, one family ru esidential district,with a two acre <br /> minimum,- <br /> The property consists aftwo parcels. is a g lot and the other is a vacant parcel. Wl�en combined, <br /> those two parcels equal 4.9 acres. Rough acres is dry buildable and 1.24 acres of wetland. The <br /> aerial photograph sh���s a wetland in nort st corner and a small creek located in the trees that <br /> flows to the southeast. As you lo owards the there is quite a bit of open and a line of trees along <br /> the driveway. The easterly p on of the property als ntains quite a bit of trees. <br /> The land use plan fo ts area in 2000 was re-guided from two re single-family to two to three units <br /> per acre single f y. The property directly north and adjacent to ' site was developed as an RPUD <br /> known as G ale Cove. Out of the nine lots that were approved, five ix of the lots have been built <br /> on. Gaf n stated essentially this will mirror that development. <br /> Page 4 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.