My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-27-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-27-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 4:44:55 PM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:13:23 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
369
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,November 18,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Staff has received updated comments today regarding the applicant's revised plan from the adjacent <br /> property owner who provided initial comments. The revised survey and detailed garage plans better <br /> clarify the existing usable space within the applicant's garage. Staff continues to find that creating a <br /> more nonconforming structure is not in character with the neighboi-hood. The revised addition adds mass <br /> within the eastern side setback area and also within the average lakeshore setback. <br /> The applicant has not demonstrated a reasonable practical difficulty supporting additional structure within <br /> the average lakeshore setback or within the 75-foot setback�trea. Further, the applicant has failed to <br /> demonstrate that enforcing the provisions of the Zonin�;Ordinance�leprive them of the reasonable use of <br /> the property. <br /> Planning Staff continues to recommend denial of the variances. ' <br /> Lixiao Wang, Applicant, stated they have downsized their proposal. 'Wang indicated they currently have <br /> three cars,with two of those vehicles being a truck and an SUV which do not fit into the garage. Wang <br /> stated if they do not do this project,they will have to continue to park the cars outside. <br /> Wang noted the neighbor's house is up higher than his a�d that the trees currently block the view from the <br /> neighbors. Wang pointed out the location ofthe trees on the overhead. <br /> Wang indicated their new proposal has been reduced by thl�ee feet,which does not provide any additional <br /> space for boats or other equipment and that they are basicall� asking for a basic three-car garage. Wang <br /> stated if they reduce the proposed garage any further,their cars wi11 not fit in the garage. Wang stated this <br /> is the best option they have. <br /> Thiesse asked if there are three garage doors now. <br /> Wang indicated there are two. � <br /> Thiesse stated�he did vi��it the property and that he recalled a two-door garage and something else without <br /> a barage door. <br /> Wang�����indicated there are not three doors. <br /> Chair Leskinen opened the public Yi�earin�� at 6:38 p.m. <br /> There ��erc no public comments regarding this application. <br /> Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 6:38 p.m. <br /> Leskinen indicated her position has not changed from the last meeting and that in her view there is still a <br /> considerable amount of massing near the shoreline. <br /> Landgraver stated the other point is if fairly common vehicles do not fit in the garage that obstructs the <br /> neighbor's view already and the cars will remain parked outside, that is worth some consideration. As <br /> proposed,the vehicles will be put away inside a symmetrical building rather than sitting outside, which <br /> seems to make sense. <br /> Page 2 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.