Laserfiche WebLink
� � <br /> , ,;-.=O\\ <br /> • � �\ <br /> / �\ <br /> _ � O O <br /> � '' CITY of URONO <br /> i `-y <br /> ti�� i�i <br /> �� ,� �+��� `�y���" �"�j <br /> ��. ��5 r �t �.� c�,l j <br /> ���,�� ��i�k������i ���,,,� �'�'; � RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> ��kESHO���� NO. 3 0 2 8 <br /> A RESOLIITION GRANTING <br /> VARIANCES TO MIINICIPAL ZONING CODE <br /> SECTIONS 10.22, SIIBDIVISIONS 1 AND 2r <br /> AND 10.55, SIIBDIVISION 8 <br /> FILE �1685 <br /> i�HEREAS, Edward F. Baker (hereinaf ter "the app 1 i cant") <br /> is owner of the property located at 3059 Farview Lane within the <br /> City of Orono (hereinafter "City" ) and legally described as <br /> follows: <br /> Lot 6 , Block 1 , Farview, Hennepin County, Minnesota <br /> (hereinafter "the property"); and <br /> WSEREAS, the app 1 i cant ha s app 1 i ed to the Ci ty f or a <br /> variance to Municipal Zoning Code Section 10.22, Subdivisions 1 <br /> and 2 and Section 10.55, Subdivision 8 to permit the construction <br /> of decks and stairways in the 0-75' lakeshare setback zone where <br /> no hardcover or structure is normal ly allowed, and encroaching on <br /> the 26' wetland setback line where no structure or hardcover is <br /> normally allowed. <br /> NOW, TH$REFOR�, BE IT 1�LSOL'4ED by the City Council of <br /> Orono, Minnesota: <br /> FINDINGS <br /> 1. This application was reviewed as Zoning File #1685. <br /> 2 . The property is located in the LR-lA, Single Family <br /> Lakeshore Residential Zoning District. <br /> 3. The Orono Planning Commission reviewed this applicat�on <br /> on September 16, 1991, and recommended approval of the <br /> proposed variances based upon the following findings: <br /> A. The existing pool already encroaches into the 26' <br /> required wetland setback and has only a minimal <br /> 1'-2' walkway around 3 sides. The decking around <br /> the pool and associated stairway to the lower <br /> level are necessary for safety and convenience. <br /> The proposed 10' encroachment of the normally <br /> required 26' wetland setback is not of significant <br /> magnitude to outweigh the safety issues. <br /> Page 1 af 6 <br />