My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
01-20-2015 Planning Commission Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 9:18:07 AM
Creation date
4/6/2015 1:09:29 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 17, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 17 of 23 <br /> <br />In addition, the road does not appear to serve any public purpose and does not provide access to other <br />properties. <br /> <br />The proposed private road corridor is 50 feet in width with a 100-foot diameter cul-de-sac as required by <br />the Subdivision Ordinance and the Community Management Plan for a local private road. The standard <br />paved width for this road would be 24 feet with an 80-foot diameter paved cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />The 30-foot access corridor to the adjacent Whalen property to the immediate north would function as the <br />access to a back lot, and by code can be shared by the owner of proposed Lot 3 as well as the owner of the <br />Whalen property. A small amount of wetland may be disturbed in improving this corridor for driveway <br />use. Gaffron noted the Whalen property is currently landlocked. The Whalen property is barely ten acres <br />but contains wetlands such that it would be a single building site. Attempts to obtain other means of <br />access to the Whalen property have been unsuccessful to date. <br /> <br />The Community Management Plan indicates that no future trails are proposed along Orchard Park Road <br />and there is no need for trail easements. As a result, payment of the standard Park Dedication fee for two <br />new building lots would be appropriate. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the City will require a road, drainage, and utilities easement over the private road, which <br />should be platted as an outlot and designed and built to City private road standards. Standard perimeter <br />drainage and utility easements will also be required along all property boundaries in the plat as well as <br />Conservation and Flowage Easements over any delineated wetlands and drainageways. <br /> <br />The property will be subject to the stormwater and drainage trunk fee. Due to the large size lots, the need <br />for stormwater improvements is likely to be minimal. The property would be served by private onsite <br />systems and private wells and full soil testing and system design will be required for each new lot as well <br />as a review of primary and alternate sites for the existing home. <br /> <br />Wetlands on the property will not be impacted except for the 30-foot corridor along the west side of <br />proposed Lot 3. The actual square footage of wetland that would be filled to create the driveway is not <br />known at this time. The MCWD would be involved in establishment of mitigation requirements if needed <br />and would also be establishing appropriate wetland buffers for the development. The City will require a <br />Conservation and Flowage Easement over the wetlands. <br /> <br />The developer has been advised that this subdivision will be subject to the City’s Conservation Design <br />Ordinance and will be reviewed in terms of the Rural Oasis goals and policies which have been approved <br />by the City Council. The majority of the property consists of open fields with scattered trees near the <br />homestead and along wetland edges. The Conservation Design Ordinance would require the applicant <br />look at invasive species and views but that in Staff’s opinion the review necessary would be minimal. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the purpose of a sketch plan review is to provide the developer with an overview of the <br />pertinent City ordinances and how they impact the proposed plat. The Planning Commission should <br />provide the developer direction on any issues that they feel require special attention. Gaffron stated this <br />application could potentially provide access to the Whalen property, which should be discussed. <br /> <br />Leskinen asked if that 100-foot notch abutting Orchard Park Road is a separate lot. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated it is a separate lot and is not part of the plat. <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 01/20/2015 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes <br />[Page 17 of 23]
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.