Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, November 17, 2014 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />  <br />Page 9 of 23  <br />  <br />that is not inherent to the land. Marquardt stated it is a safety issue and that the deck will also give them <br />the opportunity to more enjoy the property. <br /> <br />Marquardt stated when you look at the surveys, they show that the lot has somehow shrunk. Marquardt <br />stated the garage was 30 feet from the road when it was constructed but it is now 29.9 feet from the road. <br />Marquardt stated the garage did not move, but somehow these differences happen, and that they are <br />talking about a relatively small number of additional square feet. <br /> <br />Marquardt stated Melanie Curtis has been extremely helpful with their application. Marquardt indicated <br />they have a door that exits in this location and then a porch that has railings that are above the structural <br />level. Marquardt indicated they could remove that if absolutely necessary as well as the stone patio. <br />Marquardt stated they would also be willing to remove other hardcover if necessary. Marquardt stated the <br />proposed deck is not huge and that they would like to have a table and chairs out there to make it <br />functional. <br /> <br />Marquardt stated in attendance tonight are Rick Lundeen, their architect, and the two adjacent neighbors. <br />Also in attendance are the Greenes, who are three houses over. Marquardt stated they have not received <br />any objections from any of the neighbors. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen opened the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. <br /> <br />Tom Kubalak, 2623 Casco Point Road, stated he and his wife fully and wholeheartedly support the <br />addition to the house. <br /> <br />Chair Leskinen closed the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked if the house as built is larger than what was approved in 2001. <br /> <br />Curtis stated to her understanding it is not but that she is not sure if the side entry deck was included in <br />the 2001 approval. The deck is 60 square feet and the overage is approximately 70 square feet. Curtis <br />stated the survey is pretty accurate in displaying what is on the property. <br /> <br />Schoenzeit asked if it is over with the most favorable set of numbers. <br /> <br />Curtis stated she is basing it on square footages and not percentages since that would be the most <br />equitable way to compare it. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated he had a similar thought and that he noticed there is a walkway from the driveway to <br />the front door and that there is now more paving being shown, which may be a reason for the hardcover <br />increase. <br /> <br />Marquardt indicated that was there in 2001. <br /> <br />Curtis stated she is not sure how the previous survey accounted for the cantilever on the north side of the <br />house. <br /> <br />Item #01 - PC Agenda - 01/20/2015 <br />Approval of Planning Commission Minutes <br />[Page 9 of 23]