My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-13-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 4:44:19 PM
Creation date
4/3/2015 12:46:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,December 9,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (PUBLIC HEARING, Continued) <br /> Struve stated the City's CIP includes a number of needed up�rades to the City's water plants, including <br /> repainting of one of the water towers, drilling of a new well, and improvements to the treatment facilities. <br /> Struve stated while 1 1 percent is a substantial increase, it is needed to ensure the long-term financial <br /> health of the fund. Future bonding may also be necessary depending on the projects that are undertaken. <br /> McMillan noted Staff is also recommending a 4 percent increase in sewer rates. During a work session, <br /> the City Council suggested a rate increase that was equal to the Metropolitan Council Envi►-onmental <br /> Services' budget increase. <br /> Printup stated as it relates to the addition of administrative offenses and fines, he would suggest that they <br /> remove watering resh-ictions and no permit for recreational fires. <br /> Anderson asked whether the City has had fines for watering in the past. <br /> Struve i��dicated currently the City does not have watering restrictions and that he likely will be bringing � <br /> that item to the City Council next spring. <br /> Anderson stated she wouid hate to impose watering restrictions before the Council has had an opportunity <br /> to discuss that item. <br /> McMillan asked whether the City would need to adopt an ordinance prior to imposing a fine. <br /> Bremer stated waterinb restrictions would likely be governed under state statutes. <br /> Mattick stated as it relates to offenses, when someone violates a city code, the statute allows the City to <br /> issue a misdemeanor citation. Some communities have gone to administrative offenses rather than a <br /> citation that would require someone to appear in court. Mattick stated this would allow the City to <br /> iinpose a fine. <br /> Printup stated since the City does not currently impose watering restrictions, he does not want it included <br /> in tlle City's fee schedule. <br /> Mattick indicated he does not recall what the City's Code says in relation to a wateri»g ban, but that it is <br /> not uncommon for communities to have an odd/even day watering schedule during a drought. <br /> Printup stated he would like to strike it from the City's fee schedule and then discuss it fiirther under <br /> [tem 18. <br /> Bremer stated watering restrictions would be beneficial during a drought and that a number of other cities <br /> have watering bans durina droughts. <br /> Printup noted a number of the residents in the City have private wells. <br /> MeMillan asked whether tllis would relate solely to city water or both. <br /> . _ _ _ <br /> Page 4 of 35 <br /> _ _ __. . _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.