My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-13-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 4:44:19 PM
Creation date
4/3/2015 12:46:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, December 9,2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> 16. 2014 NON-UNION EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION ADJUSTMENTS—RESOLUTION <br /> NO. 6355 <br /> McMillan noted this item has been discussed a couple of times in Council work sessions and that there <br /> are a coup(e of options to choose from. <br /> Printup stated as it relates to Item No. I of the resolution, he would suggest a 1.5 percent pay adjustment <br /> effective January 1 as the non-compounding or lump sum idea the City Council has discussed. As it <br /> relates to Item 2, he would recommend the City go with the wage scale that was changed to eight steps, <br /> with a starting step of 75 percent. Printup suggested the City grandfather those people that have been <br /> hired since then. Printup stated new hires as of January 1 would fall under the eight steps. Printup <br /> indicated Nos. 3 and 4 in the resolution are fine. <br /> Printup moved,Anderson seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6355, a Resolution Approving <br /> Pay Plan Adjustments for Non-Union City Employees for 2014,with Item No. 1 reflecting a 1.5 <br /> percent pay adjustment effective January 1,2014,and to grandfather in any employees that have <br /> been hired since January 1, 2013. <br /> Mattick stated in clarification, his understandii�g is that the 1.5 percent is a lump sum, and that whatever <br /> an employee's base rate of pay is at the end of 2013, they will get a LS percent increase that would be <br /> pcorated throughout 2014, but at the end of 2014, their base pay goes back to what it is at the end of 2013 <br /> unless they add a step. <br /> Mattick stated his suggested language would be that each employee shall receive a 1.5 lump sum increase <br /> to their existing base pay and that the lump sum payment is not intended to increase the base pay. At the <br /> end of 2014, employees' base salary would be the same as it was in 2013 if they did not receive a step <br /> inerease. The lump sum increase will be equally prorated throu�hout 2014. <br /> Printup indicated he is fine with that language. <br /> Bremer stated she is against the lump sum and that in her view the City should stick with COLA. Bremer <br /> indicated she is fine with the 1.5 percent rather than 2 percent and noted the City's budget is set up to <br /> support 1.9 perce��t. Bremer indicated she likes Council Member Printup's change to No. 2 and that she <br /> would be amenable to eight steps starting with new hires. Bremer indicated she will be voting no on the <br /> resolution and that she supports the second point but not the first. <br /> Anderson stated she is okay with City Attorney Mattick s suggested language. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 1, Bremer Opposed. <br /> *17. PROPOSED 2014 OFFICIAL CALENDAR <br /> Levang moved, Anderson seconded, to a�prove the 2014 Official Calendar. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> Page 32 of 35 <br /> _ _ . __ ___ <br /> ..__ _ _. _ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.