My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-13-2014 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2014
>
01-13-2014 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2015 4:44:19 PM
Creation date
4/3/2015 12:46:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, December 9, 2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (9. #13-3637 WILLI ABBOTT ON BEHALF OF THE BROADWAY GROUP, LLC, 2350 <br /> WATERTOWNROAD,AND�7�'X WILLOW DRIVE NORTH—PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, <br /> Continued) <br /> Abbott stated in his opinion the lots would be bigger with more spacing between them. Abbott noted that <br /> .42 is the smallest lot and .88 is the largest lot. <br /> Levan� noted that is counting the wetlands. <br /> Abbott stated the footprint of the homes will also be different. Abbori stated using the 15 percent is a <br /> good idea since it works better with this type of development and will not affect the development. Abbott <br /> indicated varying the setbacks will allow for more control over what gets built. <br /> Levang asked if these will be spec homes. <br /> Abbott stated they will be built with the he(p of the owner. Abbott indicated they have already seen a lot <br /> of demand for the lots without marketing them and that they are working with a local builder to do the <br /> construction. <br /> Levang noted the layout depicts the home on Lot 5 as having a long driveway and that Lots 3 and 4 have <br /> shorter driveways. Levang stated the homes on Lots 3 and 4 are in a line but the home on Lot 5 is back <br /> further. Levang asked ���hether the homes on Lots 3 and 4 can be varied a little. <br /> Abbott stated those can be varied and that this layout is not exactly what will be built. Abbott indicated <br /> they do not have an idea e�actly what will be built on those lots until what is being proposed for lot shape <br /> is detennined wil( work. <br /> Levang asked if the homes on Lots 3, 4, and 5 will be in a pie shape, with three homes on a cul-de-sac. <br /> Abbot stated they will be, and tl�at the setback and length of the driveway will be varied so ti�e homes are <br /> somewhat different. <br /> Levang asked if every house will be individualized. <br /> Abbott sta�ed it is theii-hope that will be the case. <br /> Levang asked if Lots 3, 4, and 5 are all under the .34 acre for dry buildable. <br /> Gaffron stated the total dry contiguous for Lot 3 is .44, Lot 4 is .66, and Lot 5 is .51. If all three lots are <br /> combined, they have the most dry buildable. Lot 4 is approximately half of the area of the site. There is a <br /> creek that runs northwest to southeast that limits the contiguous dry buildable in that area. Gaffron <br /> indicated the developer will have some flexibility with Lot 5, a little less fleaibility with Lot 4, but not <br /> much with Lot 3. <br /> Levang asked if Lot 3 is 75 feet in width. <br /> Gaffron stated Lots 3, 4, and 5 are less than the required width. <br /> Page 22 of 35 <br /> __ _.. __. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.