Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday, December 9, 2013 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> (9. #13-3637 WILLI ABBOTT ONBEHALF OF THE BROADWAY GRDUP, LLC, 2350 <br /> WATERTOWN ROAD,AND XJ�7� WILLOW DRIVE NORTH—PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION, <br /> Contiizued) <br /> Under the RPUD standards, there is a requirement for a 10 percent private recreation area coming out of <br /> the plat. The Planning Commission felt that requirement would be substantially met with the dedication <br /> of the proposed conservation easement over the defined tree preservation area northeast of the creek as <br /> well as dedication of a 20-foot wide trail easement that would be located over the existing sewer easement <br /> and sewer line. Lots 1 and 2, Block 1, have an existing sewer but it is not shown as an easement, which <br /> would need to be created. Gaffron stated he is not sure why the sewer is in place without an easement. <br /> One of the requirements would be to create tl�at extension of the 20-foot sewer easement that goes <br /> east/west across the property. A trail easement would then concurrently be granted over that so people <br /> can access from Willow Drive into the tree preservation area. The Planning Commission felt that that <br /> would suffice for the 10 percent recreation area for the RPUD. <br /> The Planning Com�nission also noted that this development is right across the street from Hackberry Park <br /> and that the 10 percent recreation area may not be as critical for this type of development as opposed to <br /> the Stone Bay development. <br /> The Planning Commission further recommended that the layouut and the site configuration did not justify <br /> the creation of an Outlot to accommodate the wetland or the tree preservation areas. Gaffron noted this <br /> was a similar discussion that was had on the Northern Avenue development. Staff recommended in that <br /> case that there be an outlot that encompasses the wetland areas as well as the areas to be preserved. In <br /> this case the Planning Commission said they would rather have individual lots with their own easements <br /> rather than having an association own an Outlot that everybody would have an interest in. <br /> Gaffron stated as it relates to the grading and landscaping plans, the applicant is proposing five individual <br /> rain gardens. Some of those rain gardens straddle lot lines. The intent would be that there would be <br /> easements not only over the wetland/tree preservation areas but also over the rain gardens. The rain <br /> gardens would need to be maintained as stormwater management facilities. <br /> The developer has confirmed that he will be putting in municipal sewer and private wells rather than city <br /> water. The City of Orono does not have city water available but there is an agreement with the City of <br /> Long Lake that deals with sewer and water systems. The developer should not encounter any issues with <br /> bringing sewer to this site and would connect at a location that is within Orono. The developer would be <br /> required to pay some connection fees to Long Lake for the sewer system. <br /> Under the RPUD zoning, the properties are assigned to the hardcover protection Tier IV which allows 50 <br /> percent hardcover on each lot. This subdivision should be able to meet that limit. There will also be the <br /> standard drainage and utility easements around the perimeter of the property. There would also be a <br /> conservation easement that would need to be drafted as weli as the standard wetland easements. <br /> (Recess taken from 8:30 p.m. to 8:37 p.m.) <br /> Page 17 of 35 <br /> _ ___ _ _ _. __ __ _ _. <br />