My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
03-09-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2015 3:18:37 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 3:18:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE , <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,February 23,2015 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 9. VIDEOTAPING PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS (continued) <br /> McMillan asked if the full Planning Commission should be asked to weigh in on this before the Council <br /> votes on it. <br /> Printup stated he would like the City Council to act on it. Printup noted there is a fair amount of turnover <br /> of the Planning Commission and that this is an opporiunity for more transparency. Printup stated it would <br /> also give a lot of credit to the Planning Commission. Printup stated given the amount of vetting that <br /> happens at the Planning Commission,it is important that people have the opportunity to see that. <br /> McMillan stated in her view the Planning Commission meetings are an opportunity for public <br /> participation and that it is her feeling not that many people will actually sit down and watch it. <br /> Printup stated he also wants to error on the side of a person who is not able to attend the meeting, such as <br /> homebound people,people who are out of town or unable to attend because of work schedules. Printup <br /> stated it is important to open up the process. <br /> McMillan stated she would like to also have the Planning Commission discuss it further and that the <br /> Planning Commission may come to the consensus that they are fine with it. <br /> VOTE: Ayes 2,Nays 3,McMillan,Cornick and Levang Opposed. <br /> CITY ADMIl�TISTRATOR'S REPORT,CONTINUED <br /> 10. BUII.,DING OFFICIAL RETIREMENT/RECRUITMENT <br /> Loftus stated Building Official Lyle Oman has informed the City that he intends to retire in June of 2015 <br /> and that Staff is seeking approval to advertise for this position. Staff has provided a cost-benefit analysis <br /> for this position as well as a draft of the building official job description and a recruitment timeline. <br /> Printup noted he had mentioned a couple of weeks ago about making this position an in house position <br /> and doing the analysis. Printup stated in his view it is important to conduct that type of analysis every <br /> time a position opens up. Printup indicated he would be comfortable with keeping the position in house. <br /> Printup asked if the Council wants to discuss whether this position would be doing any supervising of <br /> other employees. <br /> Loftus stated the Building O�cial typically manages contract employees daily and that it is a preriy <br /> active contract this person is expected to manage. Loftus noted the City spends approximately$7,000 on <br /> it monthly so there is a need to have it supervised and that there is the possibility of having those <br /> inspectors in house at some point in the future. In that situation the Building Official would be the person <br /> to supervise those employees. <br /> Walsh stated the only question he had on the outsourcing comparison is that he did not understand the net <br /> savings losses. <br /> Page 16 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.