Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,March 9,2015 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (12. #15-3708 CI1'Y OF ORONO—AMEND ZONING CODE SECTION 78-1405(A)(8)— <br /> STANDARDS FOR FENCES AS A NON-ENCROACHMENT,conNnued) <br /> In measuring fence height,a question that was originally posed was what should be considered the top of <br /> the fence. The amendment as initially drafted indicated that height should be measured from the top of <br /> any part of the fence, including vertical structural supports, lattice, ornate top design elements,and so <br /> forth. It was noted that a 6-foot screening fence with decorative post fmials extending above it would <br /> technically be out of compliance with this. <br /> The Planning Commission concluded that limited fmials above the top of the fence would be appropriate. <br /> The result is an exclusion of post finials from being considered as part of the fence,plus proposed text <br /> that states as follows: "Exception: post finials extending above the top of the fence shall not exceed 10 <br /> inches in width per finial and shall not extend above the top of the fence by more than 0 percent of the <br /> allowed maximum fence height at that location. A 6-foot fence would be allowed a 7-inchy finial above <br /> the top of the fence and a 42-inch fence would be allowed a 4-inch finial." <br /> As it relates to the average fence setback,existing code indicates a different way of defining the average <br /> lakeshore setback line for fences than it does for other structures. The Planning Commission felt the <br /> current terminology creates confusion and the line being defined for fences should not be called the <br /> average lakeshore setback line. Staff is in agreement with that and the Planning Commission <br /> recommended that term be removed. <br /> The language now reads as follows: "Fences within the required side yard of a lakeshore lot shall not <br /> exceed six feet in height,and shall not exceed 42 inches in height for any portion located lakeward of a <br /> line drawn between the most lakeward projection of the fence owner's principal residence structure and <br /> the most lakeward projection of the principal residence structure on the adjacent property abutting the <br /> side yard in which the fence is located. <br /> As it relates to non-standard lakeshore lots,the following text is proposed: "When the building site of a <br /> lakeshore lot is separated from the lakeshore by a public or private road,the following defmitions will <br /> apply for fence location purposes subject to the provisions of Section 78-1405(a)(8)a.2: When the yard <br /> on the opposite side of the building site from the lake does not abut a street,such yard shall be considered <br /> as a standard rear yard. The yard between the building site and the street shall be considered as a standard <br /> front yard." <br /> The Planning Commission also recommended the following additional text to Subsection E, fence <br /> construction and maintenance: "Fencing materials shall consist of permanent all-weather products. <br /> Temporary fencing improvements,which normally consist of materials such as snow fencing, silt fence, <br /> bio-retention logs or other types of products normally associated with construction projects, shall not be <br /> allowed to remain on the property following fmal inspection, or issuance of a Certificate of Occupany for <br /> a permitted construction project,or protection of property during a similar project or winter conditions. <br /> Such temporary fencing materials shall not be allowed to remain on a permanent basis on a parcel." <br /> Page 31 of 43 <br />