My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
03-09-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2015 3:18:37 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 3:18:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,March 9,2015 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (11. #14-3700 CITY OF ORONO—AMEND ZONING CODE—AMEND SECTION 78-1379: <br /> WIND ENERGY CONVERSION SYSTEMS(WECS)FIRST REVIEW,continued) <br /> Gaffron stated there could a flashing glare at certain times based on the type of turbine and where the sun <br /> is located and then there is the shadow. Gaffron stated in his view that is what the Council saw in one of <br /> the presentations,and that every time the blade passes in front of the sun,it causes a shadow. <br /> Levang stated she likes what the City Attorney has written with the verbiage neighboring residential <br /> property being inserted in there in place of structure. <br /> McMillan noted Item 15 will be deleted relating to ornamental wind devices. <br /> Gaffron stated the Planning Commission was not comfortable placing any standards for the <br /> commerciaUindustrial WECS. <br /> Mattick stated the other item for consideration is whether the Council is comfortable with having the <br /> required acreage being smaller in commercial and industrial zones than residential zones. The <br /> commercial and industrial zones are also identified as a more intense use area. <br /> McMillan noted the City does not have that many commercial or industrial zones. <br /> Gaffron indicated the commerciaUindustrial zone would primarily be near the Highway 12 area and that <br /> many of those are located close to residential areas. <br /> McMillan asked if Navarre is in the shoreland district. <br /> Gaffron indicated most of it is in the shoreland district. Gaffron stated if the City does not allow WECS <br /> in the shoreland,that would take out a significant part of Navarre. <br /> Walsh stated he does not see any reason for lessening the standards for commercial or industrial since <br /> they have to deal with all the same issues. <br /> Printup stated he would stick with the fall zones since it is a little more relaxed. <br /> Levang stated commercial is a more intense use and that there is the potential for more harm if the <br /> apparatus fell,which may magnify the safety issue. <br /> McMillan stated generally people associate wind turbines with being in the commercial or industrial areas <br /> and that she could see maybe relaxing the acreage standard in industrial zones. <br /> Walsh noted commercial businesses also tend to require higher power demands and that a wind turbine <br /> would likely not help that to any great extent. <br /> Walsh asked if the City could ban them in commercial districts. <br /> Mattick stated that is a gray area but that it is not an outright ban. Mattick stated he does not believe <br /> WECS have to be allowed in every district. <br /> Page 28 of 43 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.