Laserfiche WebLink
#14-3700 Amend Section 78-1379 <br /> November 13,2014 <br /> Page 6 <br /> CommerciaVIndustrial WECS <br /> The 2013 draft ordinance did not allow for commerciaUindustrial WECS and therefore did not <br /> include standards for them. Model ordinances suggest differing capacities for residential versus <br /> commercial WECS. For instance, the MPCA model defines commercial WECS as equal to or <br /> greater than 100 kW and non-commercial as less than 100 kW. The MAC model suggests that <br /> SWECS for residential use would not exceed 15 kW and for commercial would be a maximum <br /> of 100 kW. <br /> A key point for Planning Commission to consider is whether Orono's limited commercial <br /> districts should allow for WECS or SWECS. Except for the Highway 12 corridor,virtually all of <br /> Orono's commercial areas are within the designated Shoreland Overlay District, including <br /> Navarre and the B-2 marina zones. The few Orono commercial sites along Wayzata Boulevard <br /> and the 40 acre Industrial Park are the only non-residential azeas of Orono that are not in the <br /> Shoreland. Consideration should also be given to the potential purposes of WECS or SWECS in <br /> a commerciaUindustrial setting - to provide electricity to serve the existing use; to generate <br /> excess power for the grid; displayed for sale to potential SWECS customers; or merely as a <br /> method of drawing attention to a commercial business. Will any of these uses require a total <br /> heiglnt higher than would be found in a Residential SWECS? <br /> Issues for Consideration <br /> 1) The intent of this study is to establish standards for SWECS as defined by state statute, <br /> i.e. those WECS less than 5000 kW capacity. <br /> 2) The City can establish a wide variety of standards for SWECS that provide for <br /> appropriate siting, design, construction, operation, safety, and compatibility with <br /> surrounding land uses. The 2013 draft was purposely quite limiting in many respects, <br /> and should be reviewed to consider whether those standards should be revised. <br /> 3) The 2013 draft ordinance may be a useful starting point for review; however, Planning <br /> Commission should be open to taking into consideration viewpoints from the industry, <br /> property owners, and other regulatory agencies in crafting an ordinance that meets the <br /> City's goals. <br /> 4) Planning Commission should consider whether SWECS should be an allowed use in <br /> commerciaUindustrial districts. If so, should they be subject to different standards than <br /> residential SWECS? <br />