My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-09-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
03-09-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2015 3:18:37 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 3:18:00 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
488
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MIlVUTES OF TI� <br /> ORONO PLANNING COD�INIISSION MEETING <br /> Monday,November 17,2014 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. ,'} <br /> �� <br /> Schoenzeit stated the ublic com �I�'�'�► <br /> p ments received tonight negate the industry's comments regarding v��. <br /> flickering, shadows,and glare. Schoenzeit asked if the neighbor has a different location on the � <br /> neighboring property that he would fmd acceptable. <br /> Lanpher stated he was asked that same question in the early lawsuits and that in his view it is not his area <br /> to judge where it should be located. Lanpher noted in 2002,when the neighbors were requesting a <br /> variance to add on to their home,the neighbor agreed to no more structure on the property. Lanpher <br /> stated the neighboring property is small and that he cannot recommend any location since it would likely <br /> be violating hardcover and other setback requirements. Lanpher stated he would refer it back to the City <br /> since he does not feel it is his place to dictate the location of it and that this is a City issue and not a <br /> personal issue. <br /> Schoenzeit stated if it is moved, it could become someone else's issue. <br /> Lanpher stated if someone wants a wind turbine on their property, consideration should be based on each <br /> properiy individually. Lanpher stated in his view you cannot have them on properties that are two acres <br /> or less given the impacts it will have on the neighbors. Lanpher stated even if it is restricted to properties <br /> ten acres or greater,there still could be potential issues with visual impacts and setbacks given the <br /> different times the sun rises and sets. Lanpher noted the commercial wind farm operations are buying out <br /> the neighboring properties. Lanpher stated the question still remains as to how far is far enough and that <br /> all of the impacts are not all known at this point. <br /> Mack noted the work session in January is intended to be the ne�ct discussion point on the various code <br /> amendment topics that were discussed at the joint work session. Mack indicated this is one of the <br /> ongoing topics that the City will be looking at over the coming year and should be made a priority. <br /> Leskinen stated this topic is definitely at the top of the priority list for the work session. <br /> Landgraver moved,Schoenzeit seconded,to table Application No. 14-3700,City of Orono, <br /> Amendment of Zoning Code Chapter 78: Amend Section 78-1379 Regarding Small Wind Energy <br /> Conversion Systems to the January Planning Commission work session. VOTE: Ayes 4,Nays 0. <br /> Page 9 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.