Laserfiche WebLink
. <br /> COUNCIL MEET1��1� <br /> Date Application Received: 3/4/15 MAR 0 9 2015 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete: 3/4/15 <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 5/3/15 <br /> CITY OF ORONO <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: March 5, 2015 <br /> Item No.: G� <br /> Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section: <br /> Name: Michael P.Gaffron Planning Dept. <br /> Title: Senior Planner <br /> Item Description: #14-3687—Real Assets II, LLC, 3720-3730 Northern Avenue <br /> —Plat of Northern Oaks <br /> —Request for Revised Grading Plan Approval <br /> List of Ezhibits: <br /> Exhibit A. Submitted Letter of Request& Real Estate Listing <br /> Exhibit B. Dev Agreement&Prelim Plat Resol Excerpt& Approved Grading Plans <br /> Exhibit C. Number of Stories Analysis by Staff <br /> Exhibit D. Submitted Revised Grading Plan Proposal <br /> Exhibit E. Submitted Color Rendering of Proposed Homes <br /> Exhibit F. Communication to Applicants 12/12/14 <br /> Summary of Request <br /> Applicants request approval of a revised grading plan and amendment of the terms of the PRD <br /> Agreement for Northern Oaks, with respect to the condition requiring compliance with the <br /> conditions of Preliminary Plat Resolution No. 6345; specifically, with the condition that the <br /> approved grading plan does not establish new existing grades for building height determination <br /> purposes [Resol. 6345,page 9, condition 3(e)]. <br /> Background <br /> The final plat of Orono Oaks was approved by the City Council in August 2014 and filed with <br /> Hennepin County in November 2014. Site grading to construct the drainage swales and ponding <br /> areas has been completed, and the first new homes are under construction on Lots 1 and 2. <br /> In reviewing the plans for a proposed home on Lot 3, staff found that the proposed home would <br /> consist of 3 stories whereas only 2-1/2 stories are allowed, based on the pre-existing grades. The <br /> final plat approval resolution specifically noted that pre-existing grades would be used for <br /> building height determinations, and that the grading plan as approved did not create new <br /> existing grades (see Exhibit B). This was because the developer was not planning to create new <br /> building pads as part of the mass grading of the site to accommodate drainage;the individual <br /> sites would be filled/graded as homes were built. <br /> Additional review noted that the same issue will be encountered on Lot 4. The bowl-shaped <br /> topography of the site results in a lower depressional azea at the required street setbacks of Lots 3 <br /> and 4. The applicants intended to add fill to accommodate home construction. On Lot 3, the <br />