My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-23-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
02-23-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2021 3:43:13 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 2:09:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
184
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
. Council <br /> Exhibit G <br /> Date Application Received: NA <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete: NA <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: NA <br /> REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: February 5, 2015 <br /> Item No. �p <br /> Department Approval: Administrator Approval: Agenda Section: <br /> Name:Mike Gaffron Planning <br /> Title: Senior Planner <br /> Item Description: 14-3707 Amend Zoning Ordinance Text: <br /> Add Language to 78-1405 Non-Encroachments Section Regarding Retaining Walls <br /> -Second Review <br /> List of Euhibits: <br /> Exhibit A. Sketches for Discussion <br /> ExhibitB. Draft Council Minutes 1/26/15 <br /> Exhibit C. Council Memo and Exhibits dated 1/22/15 <br /> Summary of Request: This change to the list of allowed non-encroachments on yard <br /> requirements in Section 78-1405 adds a section clarifying that retaining walls cannot be closer <br /> than five feet from any side or rear lot line, nor located within an easement nor within 10 feet of <br /> a traveled roadway. <br /> Planning Commission Recommendation: On 1/20/2015 the Planning Commission held a <br /> public hearing and recommended adoption of the proposed code amendment on a vote of 5-1. <br /> The lone negative vote was based on an opinion that certain very low retaining walls should be <br /> allowed closer to the lot line than 5 feet. <br /> Council Review 1/26/15: Council requested additional information on the impacts of this <br /> ordinance amendment and indicated more time was needed to consider the matter. Tabled 3-0. <br /> Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends that Council discuss the concerns about <br /> At the January 26 review of this proposed amendment, Council questioned whether the 5-foot <br /> setback from a side or rear lot line for retaining walls was necessary and whether it would apply <br /> to low structures such as timber-cribbed planter beds or low decorative terrace walls. <br /> Following are some observations that may assist Council in discussing the issue: <br /> - Other cities' codes regarding construction of retaining wa11s are widely varied. Many don't <br /> require any permit for those less than 4 feet in height. Others, similar to Orono, require a land <br /> alteration permit(which is a zoning permit, as opposed to a building permit) for walls under 4' <br /> high. At or above 4 feet in height, we require engineering and a building permit-this appears to <br /> be common among cities. Also, some cities require a permit for those under 4' in height if they <br /> support a surcharge(fill above the wall). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.