Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE , <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> February 9,2015 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (9. STORM WATER AND DRAINAGE TRLTNK FEE REVIEW continue� <br /> Levang stated the Council also needs to figure out how they are going to get to the $11 million and that if <br /> the Council gives a 50 percent credit and allows the 2-acre lots to be calculated the same as the 5-acre <br /> properties,the City will be losing money. <br /> Loftus stated the fees were originally calculated based on a need. <br /> Printup stated in his view generating$11 million in stormwater fees is probably unattainable. <br /> Levang asked if it was determined to be unattainable at the time the City set the$11 million figure. <br /> Gaffron stated the Council should look at the time necessary to collect the$11 million and that Staff <br /> could look at the remaining land to be developed and the fees that will be generated from those <br /> developments. Gaffron indicated the calculation was based on potential future properties and what it <br /> would cost to do stormwater management for those developments. Gaffron stated to lus understanding <br /> the previous Council never determined that those fees would arrive at$11 million. Gaffron noted since <br /> 2002,the City has collected$850,000 in stormwater fees. <br /> Levang noted the amount of land available for development is also shrinking. <br /> Gaffron stated the City is probably 80 to 90 percent developed at this point as it relates to undeveloped <br /> land. <br /> McMillan stated the City has two sources of revenue currently as it relates to stormwater fees: the <br /> subdivided land and the annual stormwater fee that is charged to the residents. <br /> Levang stated if the City looks at adding vacant lots,tear downs, and an addition at a certain threshold, <br /> the City would be adding two to three more sources,but if the 50 percent credit is given, it might be <br /> evening it out. <br /> Gaffron stated there is a lot of math involved in balancing that. Gaffron stated he agrees with the concept <br /> that if someone is doing an addition and adding 10 percent hardcover as opposed to doubling it, <br /> somewhere in between there might be a threshold point. <br /> Walsh stated in his mind the question about how much money the City needs and how much money the <br /> City should charge in stormwater fees are two separate questions. Walsh stated the questions the City <br /> should be asking is what a fair fee to be charged is and is the current system working. Walsh stated if the <br /> Council feels it is not working,then they should start over, and that in his view the City should start over. <br /> Walsh stated a fairly simple solution might be to have the fee be hardcover based. Walsh stated the City <br /> could have its standard fee for one or two acre lots based on 25 percent hardcover. The standard fee for a <br /> one acre lot could be set at$5,000,and if the person is over the 25 percent hardcover,they would pay <br /> more, and if they are under the 25 percent hardcover,they would pay less. Walsh stated the rates would <br /> then be$2,500 for a half acre,$5,000 for one acre,$7,500 for two acres, $10,000 for three acres, $12,500 <br /> for four acres,and anything above five acres would be$15,000. Walsh stated ifthe property has less than <br /> 25 percent hardcover;the fee would be less based on the percentage of hardcover. <br /> Page 16 of 26 <br />