My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2015
>
02-09-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2021 3:42:57 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 11:58:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
305
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE , <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,January 26,2015 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> (6. #15-3709 AMEND SECTION 78-1001(6)TO ADD NAVARRE AREA TO PUD MIXED USE <br /> PROVISIONS—ORDINANCE NO. 132 continue� <br /> Since then,the City has not been able to use the PUD process or create a PUD district outside of the <br /> Highway 12 corridor area. This change to the City Code would allow that process to be used within the <br /> Navarre area. GafFron noted there is the potential for redevelopment in the Navarre area and that the <br /> PUD District would allow for mixed use development. Gaffron indicated this would be the first step in <br /> allowing mixed use in the Navarre area and that a set of standards for PUD use should eventually be <br /> established. <br /> Cornick stated it sounds like good planning. <br /> Levang asked if any specific corridors should be specified or whether it just applies to the general <br /> Navarre area. <br /> Gaffron stated the way it was drafted initially only talks about Navarre in general. Gaffron stated there is <br /> mixed use potential on certain guided properties in Navarre and there are also properties that were not <br /> guided for mixed use but might develop at some point in the future. Gaffron stated an example is the <br /> Freshwater property,which was not guided for xnixed use,but the PUD process could be used in that <br /> situation if it is redeveloped or on larger properties that might redevelop. Gaffron stated the Council has <br /> the opportunity to review and consider whether it is appropriate for any particular piece of property. <br /> McMillan noted Highway 12 corridor is not limited to just commercial. <br /> Gaffron stated the B-6 highway commercial district was initially commercial but that the PUD process <br /> was also used for Otten Brothers and the Stone Bay development,which is residential and commercial. <br /> McMillan stated it is probably best not to limit it since different properties could be combined at some <br /> point in the future. <br /> Gaffron stated if the City's guiding changes for Navarre in the future,the City Code would need to be <br /> changed if it is limited to specific properties or specific zones. Gaffron stated he would prefer to leave it <br /> more open but that Staff could better define what the Navarre area is. Gaffron noted the highway <br /> commercial district that was created was fairly specific in the Comprehensive Plan Amendment and <br /> defined which properties were parts of it and which ones were not. <br /> McMillan stated that is something that could also be accomplished with the next Comprehensive Plan <br /> review. McMillan stated in her view that might require a significant study and public input. <br /> Gaffron stated in many cities PUD is allowed anywhere. <br /> Levang stated she would prefer it be more general at this point since it will take a more in depth study if <br /> specific streets and corridors are identified. <br /> Cornick asked what the boundaries of Navarre are. <br /> Page 6 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.