My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-09-2015 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
02-09-2015 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/29/2021 3:42:57 PM
Creation date
4/2/2015 11:58:35 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
305
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
, MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,January 26,2015 <br /> 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> 5. #15-3707 AMEND SECTION 78-1405(a)(5)TO CLARIFY RETAINING WALL AND <br /> LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE SETBACKS—ORDINANCE NO.(Tabled) <br /> Gaffron stated this is a change to the list of allowed non-encroachments on yard requirements in the City <br /> Code. T'he clarification states that retaining walls cannot be closer than five feet from any side or rear lot <br /> lines,cannot be closer than ten feet from the traveled right-of-way, and cannot be installed within an <br /> easement area. <br /> Gaffron stated because of some potential confusion and because it is not currently in the non- <br /> encroachment section, Staff would recoxnmend it be added. Gaffron stated essentially the new ordinance <br /> section states that"No retaining wall of any height shall be located closer than five feet from any side or <br /> rear property line,never fewer than ten feet from the edge of a traveled roadway,or placed within a <br /> drainage,utility,or other easement, except upon approval in writing for an encroachment agreement by <br /> the City or similar approval from another regulatory and/or utility agency." <br /> McMillan noted she attended the January Planning Commission meeting when this item was discussed <br /> and that some of the discussion revolved around the fact that the City requires a permit for a 4-foot higher <br /> retaining wall. <br /> Gaffron stated a 4-foot or higher retaining wall requires engineering. <br /> McMillan asked if somebody can construct something below that. <br /> Planning Coordinator Curtis indicated it would require a zoning permit. <br /> McMillan asked if a 2-foot high boulder wall would require a permit. <br /> Curtis stated it is associated with the grading permit. Curtis stated the City's permit form for a zoning <br /> permit has several line items that need to be filled out and that the land alteration permit has a$50 permit <br /> fee. The person would also need to indicate on the pernut application whether they are going to construct <br /> a retaining wall or other structure. <br /> McMillan asked if a raised garden bed would need a zoning permit if it is less than four feet. <br /> Curtis stated the City Code threshold is 0 to 500 cubic yards and that nowhere in the City is there a low <br /> threshold of one yard or ten yards.Curtis indicated Staff does use discretion when people call and ask <br /> about planting a garden or planting trees or moving some dirt around to level for sod, and in some cases <br /> will consult with the City Engineer to see if it really requires a permit. Since the City Code does have a <br /> zero cubic yard threshold, any earth movement technically requires a zoning permit. <br /> McMillan stated that was one of the issues a Planning Commissioner had with the change. McMillan <br /> asked at what point it becomes a reta.ining wall versus a decorative wall. <br /> Curtis stated technically a 1-foot wall would be holding soil,but it is not a retaining wall that requires an <br /> engineer design. <br /> Page 3 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.