Laserfiche WebLink
i � <br /> Project Number: 016-0019-5391 Page 2 <br /> Water level measurements were made in the boreholes during and at the completion of the <br /> borings. Based on this data, water was noticed at boring B-1 at the time of our field work. <br /> Water level was about 12 feet below the present grade at boring B-1. No water was noticed at <br /> boring B-2. Water level measurements in clayey soils may not accurate as it takes longer time <br /> to stabitize. In general,water may fluctuate throughout the year depending on several factors. <br /> We understand the new addition will be a one-story with walk-out basement. The maximum <br /> plan dimensions of the addition will be 29 feet by 34 feet. The structure will be of wood frame <br /> construction supported on load bearing walls and possible interior columns. Currently, we have <br /> no information on actual foundation loadings. However, we anticipate the maximum column <br /> loads may be on the order of 50 kips and perimeter wall load will not exceed 2 kips per lineal <br /> foot. We also understand the new addition will match the existing structure. <br /> The excavations for the basement floor, south and west frost footing trenches were completed <br /> before our field work. The north and east footing lines were also excavated to about the <br /> bottom of basement floor elevation. <br /> The existing fill, and very soft peat noticed at boring B-1 should not be relied upon for new <br /> foundation support because of limited strength and compressibility potential. To remove and <br /> replace these soils will require up to 15 feet of excavation at boring B-1. Conventional <br /> excavation and refill procedure may not be desirable due to depth of excavation and wet <br /> condition. <br /> In our opinion, a deep foundation system may be suitable for supporting the proposed addition. <br /> A deep foundation system of helical compression anchors may be considered. Other deep <br /> foundations may be used, such as driven piles. However, because of relatively smaller size <br /> project, near an existing house and potential vibrations from driven pile installation, in our <br /> opinion, a deep foundation system of helical compression anchors may be more applicable at <br /> this site. <br /> Helical compression anchors have the advantage of minimal site surface disturbance. In <br /> addition,there is little or no potential negative (downdrag) load on the anchors from the <br /> compressible soils. <br /> We recommend the foundation system consist of helical compression anchors. A helical <br /> configuration consisting of three helixes of 10, 12 and 14 inches in diameter may be used. The <br /> capacity for this anchor configuration should be 15 kips per anchor. Other configurations will <br /> yield different capacity. The capacity includes a safety factor of 2.0 against soil bearing failure. <br /> The maximum final torque of each anchor should be documented to verify the capacity. fn <br /> addition, a quick load test may be performed on one or more anchors to determine the actuaf <br /> anchor capacity attained. <br /> .�s@O Engineering Consultants Inc <br />