My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
#3203-variances-1992
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
H
>
Hanlon Avenue
>
537 Hanlon Avenue - 02-117-23-31-0015
>
Resolutions
>
#3203-variances-1992
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:07:56 PM
Creation date
1/19/2017 12:47:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
537
Street Name
Hanlon
Street Type
Avenue
Address
537 Hanlon Ave
Document Type
Resolutions
PIN
0211723310015
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � <br /> � O ' v <br /> O O <br /> �b - CITY of URONO <br /> � �" <br /> � �'� RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> L9kESH�4� NO. 3 2 0 3 <br /> B. The location of an oversized accessory structure <br /> on the property with doors facing towards detached <br /> garage require adequate area for maneuvering <br /> movement for heavy equipment and large truck <br /> stored in oversized accessory structure. As a <br /> result, the structure cannot be moved further <br /> south or further away from the side lot line. <br /> C. The building envelope of the detached garage is <br /> not being expanded upon and the improvements <br /> involve merely structural replacement of walls. <br /> D. The steep bank at the north side lot line was <br /> retained by the masonry wal 1 of the former garage. <br /> The pressures of the earthen bank weakened and <br /> crushed the north wall of the garage. <br /> E. The property owner to the immediate north has <br /> submitted a letter to the City stating they have <br /> no problem with the boulder wall as installed at <br /> the lot line by applicant. <br /> F. The 8' high wall functions as a gravity type <br /> retaining wall and has not been approved by an <br /> engineer. The City cannot approve the wall as <br /> constructed recognizing it represents a safety <br /> risk and homeowner shall have the sole liability <br /> in the event of a failure. <br /> 4. The City Council finds that the conditions existing on <br /> this property are peculiar to it and do not apply <br /> generally to other property in this zoning district; <br /> that granting the variance would not adversely affect <br /> traffic conditions, light, air nor pose a fire hazard <br /> or other danger to neighboring property; would not <br /> merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is <br /> necessary to alleviate a demonstrable hardship or <br /> difficulty; is necessary to preserve a substantial <br /> property right of the applicant; and would be in <br /> keeping with the spirit and intent of the Zoning Code <br /> and Comprehensive P lan of the City. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.