Laserfiche WebLink
l"t..Y w 7: " � �)ti�:. <br /> �.�W3'^xi�t'�''r,�L�N. <br /> .L.rd4Sf� , <br /> _M,�:{ '7' . <br /> ��r <br /> .. . ���j��y ..� . <br /> / <br /> � <br /> � <br /> T0: Jeanne Mabusth, Zoninq Administr�!itor <br /> FROM: Michael P. Gaffron, On-Site SystE��ms Manaqer <br /> nATE: February 25, 1980 <br /> SUBJECT: On-Site Evaluation, Green Trees <br /> Subdivision �541 <br /> I have reviewed the soil testing and evaluation report submitted <br /> j, by the applicant and recommend approval of the proposed diviaion <br /> � subject to the items noted below: <br /> ; Lot 1 - Percolation ratg and indicated wate:r table depth will allo�r <br /> � a standard drainfield. Extreme car�s must be taken to protect <br /> L, � this area from construct on traf�c and disturbance due to <br />'L:;� .� its proximity to the existinq road. <br /> s;>r.: <br /> ,�,. <br />,�;� : Lot Z - Percolation rate and water table depth will allow a standard <br />` k�, drainfield. Depending on final plac�ement of house, <br />�p��'�`'� additional testinq might be necessa:y prior to issuinq a <br />'':J�'"Nf'�, <br />� . buildinq permit. <br />� : <br /> s���:� Lot 3 - Has existinq house and drainfield. No problems With existinq <br />��,x>, <br />,;<.::vl , drainfield were noted. Testinq showed adequate area and soils <br />�k : � for future drafnfield. A new Well to be located on the lot <br />��� will not encroach on drainfield areas. <br /> � <br />���; <br />�}�� Lot 4 - Existinq mansion - will have neN drainfield installed in <br /> ',r tested area. Percolation rate and w,�ter table Mill allow <br />�,,:;�{�>� atandard drainfield. <br />� <br />� ;, � Lots 5 b 6 - Soil testinq indicated fair perc:olation rate for those <br /> holes which did not freeze. Soil te��turea would indicate <br />� j no problema will be encountered with a standard drainfield <br />! system, although some additional teat:inq o verify Water <br />� table depth and extent of qood soils will� r�quired prior <br />�`;,� to isauance of permits. <br />�a - . <br />�_'.� Baaed on the fnformation presented and the aoil ty� indicated, I <br />� � am confident that adequate area�s of suitable soil exist•on each <br /> � proposed lot to support satisfactory septic syatema. Some additional <br /> � testing Mill be required on certain lots prior to iaauance of permitat <br /> j however, I feel we are justified in approvinq the propoaed lots based <br /> � on the information presented. <br /> Please note that about 67ne-third of the perco:lntion teats on thia <br /> division tailed due to freezing and frost dep�:h. We alNays warn <br /> ' prospective developers that perc tests taken in the winter mey very <br /> Well fail due to frost. This case again proves the point. <br /> , r . ..� .., . <br /> " ,. , ; ,�;; <br />