My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
RE: retaining wall
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
G
>
Graham Hill Road
>
3300 Graham Hill Road - 05-117-23-11-0011
>
Correspondence
>
RE: retaining wall
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 5:15:33 PM
Creation date
1/12/2017 1:23:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
3300
Street Name
Graham Hill
Street Type
Road
Address
3300 Graham Hill Rd
Document Type
Correspondence
PIN
0511723110011
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � <br /> , . o <br /> SCHIMNOWSK ! ENGIHEERS <br /> CRITERIUM-SCHIMNOWSKI ENGINEERS <br /> 161 DUNBAR WAY <br /> MAHTOMEDi,MN 55115 <br /> TEL 651779-7700 <br /> FAX 651779-7114 <br /> www.criterium-sch imnowski.com <br /> May 25,2012 <br /> Ann Murphy <br /> 3300 Graham Hill Road <br /> Long Lake, MN 55356 <br /> RE: Boulder Retaining Wall Evaluation <br /> 3300 Graham Hill Road <br /> Long Lake, Minnesota <br /> Project No. 12-0658 <br /> Deaz Ms. Murphy: <br /> This letter is being sent per your request regarding the existing boulder retaining walls at 3300 Graham <br /> Hill Road in Long Lake,Minnesota. This evaluarion is based on observations I made during a site visit <br /> on May 24,2012, and verbal statements made to me by the wall contractor,John Christoferson of <br /> Minnesota Green,regarding construction means and methods. <br /> The construction of the retaining walls appeazs to be structurally stable and in general conformance with <br /> boulder retaining wall indushy standazds. The walls were constructed with boulders of sufficient size and <br /> setback. Other details also appeazed to be followed correctly. <br /> The walls addressed in this letter are on the south side of the house in a 2-tiered wall configuration. The <br /> lower wall has a maximum exposed height of about 4.5 feet. The upper wall is approximately 4 to 5 feet <br /> behind the lower wall(face to face distance)and has a maximum exposed height of about 3 feet. Level <br /> slopes are present at the top and bottom of the walls. No other surcharge loads are present on the <br /> retaining walls. <br /> Some industry standard practice references used for this evaluation regarding installation,specifications, <br /> and details include: <br /> - Boulders shall be placed to avoid continuous joint planes in vertical or lateral directions. <br /> - Each boulder shall bear rocks below it with good flat-to-flat contact. <br /> - Install woven landscape fabric behind the boulders to limit soil migration through the wall face. <br /> This evaluation was performed using the design guidelines presented in the third edition of the"Design <br /> Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls"(DMSRVI�published by NCMA in 2009. Direct all surface <br /> LICENSED <br /> PROFESSiONAI <br /> ENGINEERS <br /> HOME&BUILDING INSPECTIONS <br /> STRUCTURALEVALUATIONS <br /> aSSOCIATION RESERVE/TRANSITION STUDIES <br /> RESI DENTIAUCOMMERCIAL <br /> RETAINING WALL DESIGN�EVALUATIONS � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.