Laserfiche WebLink
, << <br /> Christine Mattson <br /> From: Christine Mattson <br /> Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2016 10:40 AM <br /> To: 'TJohnson@southviewdesign.com'; 'knicklow@southviewdesign.com' <br /> Cc: 'lynne@lawlmr.com'; Melanie Curtis; Roger Peitso <br /> Subject: RE: 1285 French Creek Rd /#2016-01192 <br /> Tim, <br /> My responses to your questions below are in red. <br /> Christine� <br /> From:Tim Johnson [mailto:TJohnson@southviewdesign.com] <br /> Sent:Wednesday, September 28, 2016 5:36 PM <br /> To: Christine Mattson <CMattson@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Cc: Melanie Curtis<MCurtis@ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: 1285 French Creek Rd <br /> Hi Christine, <br /> Thank you for taking the time to meet with me today. I have attached a few images that show the current deck foot <br /> print, the lower yard areas to the pond "wetland", and the current timber walls. I have a few comments that I would like <br /> you to consider as you finalize your decision on what parts of the project I can start on prior to the 14th. i will list these <br /> below and will look for your fol�ow up tomorrow per our conversation. Please feel free to call me on my mobile number <br /> listed below if you have any questions and when you are ready to update me on the items in question. <br /> • From our conversation today, I am of the understanding that I can begin the wall work prior to the 14t'' if I build <br /> the new boulder wall in the same foot print as the lower timber wail. Please understand that my boulders will <br /> be a little wider than the current timbers. Yes, I will get the permit ready to be issued for construction of the <br /> lower wall to be rebuilt in-kind (20') with boulders. To clarify the pictures show timbers walls, but depicted as <br /> block walls on the survey.The proposed extension of the lower wall and the upper wali cannot be constructed <br /> until the wetland delineation has been completed and an alternate septic site has been identified. <br /> • You are ok with me moving forward with the removal of the current deck. Yes,you can remove the deck, but <br /> per City Code Section 58-47(d) no expansion is allowed without design and preservation of a future drainfield <br /> site. Although we haven't received the building permit yet for the deck, the deck permit will not be issued until <br /> a future drainfield site has been identified and approved by the Roger Peitso, the City's septic specialist. <br /> • You mentioned that the only items at this time that could pause the project would be the septic system and if <br /> there was a disagreement by the Watershed District on the wetland delineation line? Yes. <br /> • I have spoken with the Steve Kennedy (Septic Designer) and he was going to come out to site Monday after his <br /> locates were confirmed to review the site. He did recall his previous work and was going to connect with Roger <br /> on any further questions. I am hoping he will be able to work out the Secondary location by mid to late next <br /> week. <br /> • Regarding the delineation line, I am still struggling with the fact that we cannot start the deck prior to the <br /> 14th? Per our measuring today, the new deck is only extended out about 1' further than the furthest location of <br /> the current deck. The new decks footprint is no further out than the current patio that is under the current deck <br /> and the patio area that is further out on the house side (see images). We are eliminating the side catwalk that <br /> i <br />