My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2014-00353 - alter size of deck
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
G
>
Glendale Cove Lane
>
2365 Glendale Cove Lane - 34-118-23-33-0068
>
Permits/Inspections
>
2014-00353 - alter size of deck
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/22/2023 4:57:10 PM
Creation date
12/20/2016 2:06:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
2365
Street Name
Glendale Cove
Street Type
Lane
Address
2365 Glendale Cove Lane
Document Type
Permits/Inspections
PIN
3411823330068
Supplemental fields
ProcessedPID
Updated
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� . . • <br /> Hi Melanie, <br /> We are looking into our options to fix the deck to conform to the setback. <br /> Does the deck need to be changed before we get our $10,000 back that we put down with you before we closed? <br /> Thanks! <br /> Steve <br /> --- Original Message --- <br /> From: "Melanie Curtis" <MCurtis(a�ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Sent: October 23, 2013 9:54 AM � <br /> To: "'Steve Barnier"' <steve barnier34(�a,hotmail.com> <br /> Cc: "Lyle Oman" <LOman(a�ci.orono.mn.us>, "Christine Mattson" <CMattson(a�ci.orono.mn.us> <br /> Subject: RE: 2365 Glendale Cove Lane/#2012-00901 <br /> Steve <br /> The deck encroaches into the setback. I do not have the ability to approve/accept an as-built plan that does not conform <br /> to the setbacks without the Council's approval of a setback variance. <br /> The City asked for but did not require an updated survey for just the deck construction part of the project as the survey <br /> for the home construction was very recent. Your permit application contained a sketch of the proposed deck on a reduced <br /> copy of the approved home permit survey. You could have chosen to re-survey and stake the proposed deck as is always <br /> recommended, however this deck was permitted based on the best information (existing survey and deck plans) to save <br /> you the cost of additional survey work. As part of the construction project the setbacks should have been staked on site <br /> prior to construction to assure no encroachments. <br /> I'm happy to work toward a solution on this issue with you. <br /> Melanie Curtis � 952.249.4627 � mcurtisCa>ci.orono.mn.us <br /> From: Steve Barnier [mailto:steve barnier34@hotmail.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 9:47 AM <br /> To: Melanie Curtis <br /> Cc: Lyle Oman; Christine Mattson <br /> Subject: RE: 2365 Glendale Cove Lane/ #2012-00901 <br /> Good morning Melanie, <br /> Attached is a revised as-built survey that I wanted to show you that has the correct deck measurement of 12 <br /> feet from the back of the house. The builder will be submitting the official as-built with some other small <br /> revisions later. But I wanted to discuss the deck with you again. The previous survey showed 12.6 feet which <br /> you explained was the issue before because it did not match the as-builtsurvey. The deck plans that were <br /> submitted (also attached) indicated 12 feet from the back of the house which now matches the attached <br /> revised survey. With this update, the deck is 14 inches in the setback. Please call me at 651-253-7911 at your <br /> earliest convenience to discuss. <br /> Thanks, <br /> Steve <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.