Laserfiche WebLink
16 • Justice Research and Policy <br />Although rapists have drawn the attention of the criminal justice system for many <br />years, the activities of other types of sex offenders were brought to the forefront <br />of public attention in the 1990s, spurred by several high-profile kidnappings, <br />molestations, and murders of children. Legislation such as Megan’s Law and the <br />Jacob Wetterling Act propelled sex offenders into the public spotlight by requir- <br />ing that they register with the state and that the public be notified of their exist- <br />ence and often their whereabouts. <br />Relatively little research, however, has focused on sex offenders themselves, <br />and most research that has been conducted has used very small samples or has <br />remained relatively obscured in the tables and graphs of state crime publications. <br />This study attempts to overcome some of those limitations. We examined the <br />population of sex offenders who had children as victims in one metropolitan <br />county in Arkansas to see where offenders live in relation to parks, schools, and <br />day cares. Our argument is that child sex offenders are largely incorrigible and <br />they may attempt to live in areas with a high concentration of children. We use <br />routine activities theory to explain our results, and conclude that this theory is <br />capable of explaining this type of crime and may be beneficial to policymakers in <br />controlling sex offenses against children. <br />*Sex Offenders and Victims <br />In June 2000, Christopher Reardon was arrested for sexually abusing young <br />boys. Interest in the case increased when it was learned that Reardon used his job <br />as a youth minister and YMCA swim coach to befriend the boys before he mo- <br />lested them. Reardon ultimately pled guilty to 120 counts of sexual abuse of a <br />child. This case is only one example of the many sexual abuse cases in which <br />adults use their physical or geographic relationship to gain access to young children. <br />The National Clearinghouse on Child Abuse and Neglect (1996, p. 8) reports <br />that the number of cases of sexually abused children increased from about 119,200 <br />in 1986 to 217,000 in 1993, an 83% increase. Hillman and Solek-Tefft (1988, p.1) <br />estimate that at least 25% of all Americans were sexually abused as children. Even <br />though many children are sexually abused each year, little research has focused <br />on offenders who target children (Crewdson, 1988, p. 115). <br />Sexual abuse has been defined in a variety of ways. McGrath (1991, p. 341), <br />for example, describes it as an act that takes advantage of a “weaker, more vul- <br />nerable person.” He suggests that offenders often choose victims who are unable <br />to fight back, such as children and those who suffer from a mental illness or <br />mental retardation. Colton and Vanstone (1996, p. 2) define child sexual abuse <br />as the “carrying out of sexual acts by adults with children below the age of