|
Rengert, G. F., Piquero, A., & Jones, P. (1999). Distance decay reexamined. Criminology,37, 427-446.
<br />Sample, L., & Bray, T. M. (2006). Are sex offenders different? An examination of rearrest patterns. Criminal Justice Policy
<br />Review,17, 83-102.
<br />Snyder, H. N. (2000). Sexual assault of young children as reported to law enforcement: Victim, incident and offender charac-
<br />teristics. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
<br />Stengel, K. M., Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (in press). Examining rates of sexual offenses from a routine activities
<br />perspective. Victims & Offenders.
<br />Tewksbury, R. (2007). Exile at home: The unintended collateral consequences of sex offender residency restrictions.”
<br />Harvard Civil Rights—Civil Liberties Law Review,42, 531-540.
<br />Tewksbury, R., & Lees, M. B. (2006). Perceptions of sex offender registration: Collateral consequences and community expe-
<br />riences. Sociological Spectrum, 26, 309-334.
<br />Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (2006). Where to find sex offenders:An examination of residential locations and neighbor-
<br />hood conditions. Criminal Justice Studies,19,61-75.
<br />Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (in press–a). Collateral consequences and community re-entry for registered sex offenders
<br />with child victims: Are the challenges even greater? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation.
<br />Tewksbury, R., & Mustaine, E. E. (in press–b). Where registered sex offenders live: Community characteristics and proximity
<br />to possible victims. Victims & Offenders.
<br />Tita, G., & Griffiths, E. (2005). Traveling to violence: The case for a mobility-based spatial typology of homicide. Journal of
<br />Research in Crime and Delinquency, 42, 275-308.
<br />Turley, E., & Hutzel, L. (2001). West Virginia Sex Offender Study. Charleston, WV: Division of Criminal Justice Services.
<br />Retrieved November 8, 2005, from http://www.wvdcjs.com/publications/
<br />Walker, J. T., Golden, J. W., & VanHouten, A. C. (2001). Geographic link between sex offenders and potential victims:
<br />A routine activities approach. Justice Research and Policy,3, 15-34.
<br />Walker, J. T., Madden, S., Vasquez, B. E., VanHouten, A. C., & Ervin-McLarty, G. (2006). Influence of sex offender regis-
<br />tration and notification laws in the United States. Little Rock: Arkansas Crime Information Center.
<br />Warren, J., Reboussin, R., Hazelwood, R. R., Cummings, A., Gibbs, N., & Trumbetta, S. (1998). Crime scene and distance
<br />correlates of serial rape. Journal of Quantitative Criminology,14, 35-59.
<br />Zandbergen, P. A., & Hart, T. C. (2006). Reducing housing options for convicted sex offenders: Investigating the impact of
<br />residency restriction laws using GIS. Justice Research and Policy,8, 1-24.
<br />504 CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND BEHAVIOR
<br /> at University of British Columbia Library on April 27, 2010 http://cjb.sagepub.comDownloaded from
|