My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-22-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
08-22-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2016 3:59:52 PM
Creation date
12/16/2016 3:53:42 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE # 16-3851 <br />9 Aug 2016 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br /> <br />Applicable Regulations: <br />Rear and Side Yard Setback Variances (Code Section 78-1434) <br />The property is a corner lot. By definition, as the short side, Shoreline Drive is considered the <br />“front” yard for setback purposes; the south lot line is the rear. The garage exceeds 1,000 <br />square feet and is therefore defined as an oversized accessory structure (OAS) requiring <br />additional setbacks. The property owner would like to construct a second story over the OAS, <br />an upward expansion, to allow for storage and living space on the second level. Because the OAS <br />does not meet the required 30-foot setbacks from all property lines, variances are required. <br /> <br />A side setback variance is requested to allow expansion of the second story 28.4’ from the side <br />lot line where a 30-foot setback is required; additionally a variance is requested to allow <br />expansion 11.9’ from the rear lot line where a 30-foot setback is required. <br /> <br />Building to Building Separation Variance (Code Section 78-1438) <br />The code requires a 10-foot separation between buildings to reduce the appearance of massing. <br />The existing screen porch structure is 10 feet from the nearest garage corner, however the <br />property owner proposes to construct the addition in line with the foundation of the west side <br />of the house to the extent of the existing deck. This results in a one foot encroachment into the <br />10’ separation requirement from corner to corner. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br />to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br />Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br />also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br />subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />proposed addition and second story on the garage are residential in nature. There is <br />adequate space for light air and open space between the proposed addition and <br />garage; the proposed second story addition will not further encroach into the rear or <br />side setbacks. The variances are in harmony with the Ordinance. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variances resulting in a <br />permit for construction of improvements to a single family residence and residential <br />garage in a residential zone are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.