Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # 16-3849 <br />14 July 2016 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />the neighboring cabins; and the existing tree stands combined with the <br />elevation result in a unique circumstance not created by the landowner <br />allowing for the cabin and therefore the solar panels to be almost completely <br />screened from views off the property, and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. The solar panels <br />will not be visually obtrusive and will screened from views from off of the <br />property adequately by existing vegetation and the topography. <br />Additionally City Code 78-123 provides additional parameters within which a variance may be <br />granted as follows: <br />4. Practical difficulties also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct <br />sunlight for solar energy systems. Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered <br />construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, subd. 2, when in harmony with Orono <br />City Code Chapter 78. Orono’s code permits only roof mounted solar panels to be <br />constructed. The roof of the nonconforming cabin is the only place where solar panels <br />are permitted on the property. <br />5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. The cabin is an existing nonconforming <br />structure and the property contains a large number of mature trees for screening. <br />The topography increases as it moves away from the lake and toward the property at <br />560 Big Island. The property on the western side of the right-of-way is separated from <br />the applicant’s cabin by approximately 30 feet and sits slightly below the applicant’s <br />cabin. The proposed solar panels will not adversely impact adjacent properties. <br />6. The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which <br />the land is located. The proposal does not appear to be out of character with the area. <br />7. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. This criterion appears to be met. <br />8. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort <br />or morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of this chapter. The proposed <br />solar panels on the roof of the cabin will not impair the health, safety, comfort or <br />morals of the public. <br />9. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable difficulty. This statement is true. <br /> <br />The Commission may recommend or Council may impose conditions in granting of variances. <br />Any conditions imposed must be directly related to and must bear a rough proportionality to the <br />impact created by the variance. No variance shall be granted or changed beyond the use <br />permitted in this chapter in the district where such land is located. <br /> <br />Septic System Status <br />Please see the attached memo from Orono’s Building Official, Roger Peitso, regarding the septic <br />system (Exhibit E). <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties <br />Applicant should be asked to discuss the Practical Difficulties regarding the application. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br /> <br />Staff finds that due to the Code requirement for solar panels and the existing cabin on the <br />property in a nonconforming location, there is no conforming way for the applicant to install solar