Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 11, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 14 of 25 <br /> <br />12. #16-3822 LAKEWEST, LLC, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST, PRELIMINARY <br />PLAT REVIEW (continued) <br />Gaffron stated at the end of the cul-de-sac on Kelly Parkway, east of the main access to Stone Bay, the <br />emergency access point consists of a grassy area with a grid underneath that allows fire trucks to drive <br />over. Gaffron stated it would be possible to do something similar in this situation and that there would <br />not be a need to erect posts or a barricade in that area. <br /> <br />Walsh asked what would happen if something like that is not there and the fire chief says that is not going <br />to work. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated if there is no emergency access, he is not sure what the answer would be. Gaffron stated if <br />Hennepin County is only going to allow the one access point, if something happens and those people <br />cannot get out, they cannot get out, and that he does not know what the answer is. Gaffron stated it <br />appears the County will not allow a second access until that other area is developed. The proposed cul- <br />de-sac 3 and 2 road is between 600 to 800 in length. <br /> <br />Gaffron noted the Stone Bay development has long cul-de-sacs with loops and that there are other long <br />cul-de-sacs in the City where the same issue could happen. Gaffron noted this development will also <br />have city sewer and water and that there will be fire hydrants located throughout the development. <br /> <br />Printup asked whether the safety access, if built, could ever be turned into a permanent access. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated it is not impossible but that a variety of changes might need to be done to address sightline <br />issues. <br /> <br />McMillan commented the residents that live near there would also likely not want the road to become a <br />through road. McMillan asked what Outlot C is for. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated one of the RPUD requirements is that the developer donate 10 percent of its land area as a <br />private park, which is what Outlot C is for. The developer will also be providing a trail that goes around <br />the perimeter of the landfill on the high land. The Planning Commission and Park Commission felt that <br />the trail was more than adequate and did not recommend a land donation in place of a park dedication fee. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated if the City Council is comfortable with the .782 floor area ratio on average, that would be <br />fine and that he would prefer not to have to determine the FAR for each individual lot. <br /> <br />Walsh commented he is comfortable with the average. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the developer is held to a certain design. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he has a bit of a concern that there will be multiple builders. Gaffron stated if they get to <br />the point where there are builders who want to do something different than the proposed plan, there will <br />likely be issues. Gaffron stated he would like to avoid what happened with Stone Bay and the necessity <br />of re-educating the different builders on what is required and critical. <br />