My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-25-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
07-25-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2016 3:11:52 PM
Creation date
12/16/2016 3:07:26 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
195
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, July 11, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 11 of 25 <br /> <br />7. LURTON PARK (continued) <br />Walsh stated he did not see any issues walking the park but that he would need more information on <br />whether the line needs to be adjusted based on the delineation. <br /> <br />McMillan noted when the variance was approved, the line on the map was approved, and that she is <br />wondering whether spending the money on the delineation makes sense. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he is attempting to move the process forward. Walsh noted the Council will still have to <br />approve the rules and regulations for the park and approve the budget. <br />McMillan asked if Council Member Walsh would like the delineation done before the facts and findings <br />are completed for the resolution. <br /> <br />Walsh stated all those things will have to be done before a final vote. <br /> <br />McMillan stated the variance can come back before that unless he would like it held back. <br /> <br />Walsh recommended the Council hold off on approving the resolution until all the pieces are together. <br /> <br />City Attorney Mattick stated the variance allows the City to build up to a certain point and that they can <br />back off of that. <br /> <br />Walsh stated that can be adjusted and that he is only talking about the small dog park area for the <br />delineation. Walsh stated it is a starting point so everyone knows where the City is going and that the <br />Park Commission also has to meet to talk about the rules and regulations. <br /> <br />MOTION: Walsh moved, Printup seconded, to adjust the blue fence line to go straight across, with <br />the approval of the entire dog park being subject to the City developing a full set of rules and <br />regulations for the park; adding back in the well, the day fee box and sign, the bench, picnic table <br />and shade structures that were taken out of the plan at the April meeting; subject to the neighbors <br />being notified of the survey; and subject to a delineation of the wetland being completed, with Staff <br />being directed to work with the City’s Consulting Engineer on the wetland delineation at an <br />anticipated cost of $7,000 to $9,000. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0 <br /> <br />*8. WATERTOWN ROAD AND STUBBS BAY ROAD REHABILITATION – PAY <br />REQUEST NO. 4 – FINAL <br /> <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to approve Pay Request No. 4, Final, to Bituminous Roadways in <br />the amount of $31,669.63 for the Watertown Road and Stubbs Bay Road rehabilitation project. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />*9. WATERTOWN ROAD PHASE 2 REHABILITATION – PAY REQUEST NO. 1 <br /> <br />Levang moved, Printup seconded, to approve Pay Request No. 1 to Valley Paving in the amount of <br />$245,751.87 for the Watertown Road Phase 2 rehabilitation project. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.