Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7. “The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one -family dwelling as a two-family <br />dwelling.” <br />This does not apply. <br /> <br />8. “The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or immediatel y <br />adjoining property.” <br />Properties along the lake are required to meet setbacks, including the lake setback, which varies <br />between 75 and 150 feet, depending on the type of lake. In almost every situation, the principal use of <br />the property is carried out with construction of a principal structure, a dwelling or commercial structure. <br />The special condition in this situation is the “principal” structure is the fence, far less obtrusive. Here, <br />the special condition is this is public land, for the benefit of th e public, rather than for the private <br />enjoyment of individuals. <br /> <br />9. “The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land is located.” <br /> There are no other off leash parks planned in the RR-1B zoning districts or elsewhere in the city. <br /> <br />10. “The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right <br />of the applicant.” <br />The park is a public park, and the owners are the public, represented by the City Council. T he goal of <br />this park improvement is to expand the benefit to the public, t he substantial property right of the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />11. “The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other <br />respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code.” <br />The requested variance is from a section of the code intended to preserve views from the lake into <br />property and to preserve the natural character of wetlands. The variance will likely not be visible to <br />those outside the park from the lake. The fencing will in many ways preserve and maximize the benefit <br />of the wetland as dogs and people would be restricted from the wetland, disturbing wildlife within. The <br />variance will allow for the continued effectiveness of the code for this project and this property. <br /> <br />12. “The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to <br />alleviate demonstrable difficulty.” <br />The variance allows the owner to install park fencing at the optimal location to the benefit of the public <br />and it’s eventual users, while preserving the goals of the buffer and setback requirements. <br /> <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Statement <br />Should you feel the practical difficulties cannot fully be described in the above criteria, describe the practical <br />difficulties preventing compliance with Zoning Ordinance requirements in the following lines (attach additional <br />sheets if necessary): <br /> <br />Practical difficulties, when applied to accessory structures, are challenging to address, as accessory <br />structures are accessory to the principal use and enjoyment of the property. As part of the planned and <br />lawful improvement of the park, the owner intends to construct an off leash dog park. An off lease park is <br />almost identical to other parks, except that pets are allowed to be off leash. The pets are controlled by their <br />masters, and corralled using fencing, often chain link fencing. In this manner, the principal structure for <br />the park is the fencing. <br /> <br />The improvements are located to preserve the natural identity of the park by siting the fence to incorporate <br />slopes, existing trails, and vegetation. The 47’’ woven wire fencing is designed to blend into the agricultural <br />history of the property. The fencing is not proposed to be chain link because chain link is visually more <br />apparent. <br />