My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-27-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
06-27-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2016 9:39:09 AM
Creation date
12/16/2016 9:31:30 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
405
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CliftonLarsonAllen LLP <br />CLAconnect.com <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT <br />ON MINNESOTA LEGAL COMPLIANCE <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and <br /> Members of the City Council <br />City of Orono <br />Orono, Minnesota <br /> <br />We have audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of <br />America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards <br />issued by the Comptroller General of the United States, the financial statements of the governmental <br />activities, the business type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information <br />which collectively comprise the basic financial statements of City of Orono (the City), as of and for the <br />year ended December 31, 2015, and have issued our report thereon dated June 21, 2016. <br /> <br />The Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, promulgated by the State <br />Auditor pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 6.65, contains seven categories of compliance to be tested: <br />contracting and bidding, deposits and investments, conflicts of interest, public indebtedness, claims and <br />disbursements, miscellaneous provisions, and tax increment financing. Our study included all of the <br />listed categories. <br /> <br />In connection with our audit, nothing came to our attention that caused us to believe that the City failed <br />to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Legal Compliance Audit Guide for Political Subdivisions, <br />except as described in the Schedule of Findings and Recommendations as item 2015-001. However, <br />our audit was not directed primarily toward obtaining knowledge of such noncompliance. Accordingly, <br />had we performed additional procedures, other matters may have come to our attention regarding the <br />City’s noncompliance with the above-referenced provisions, insofar as they relate to accounting <br />matters. <br /> <br />The City’s response to the finding identified in our audit is described in the accompanying schedule of <br />findings and responses. The City’s response was not subjected to the auditing procedures applied in <br />the audit of the financial statements and, accordingly, we express no opinion on it. <br /> <br />The purpose of this report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of compliance and the results of <br />that testing, and not to provide an opinion on compliance. Accordingly, this communication is not <br />suitable for any other purpose. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> CliftonLarsonAllen LLP <br />Minneapolis, Minnesota <br />June 21, 2016
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.