My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-23-2016 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2016
>
05-23-2016 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2016 8:56:05 AM
Creation date
12/16/2016 8:51:59 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
218
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, May 9, 2016 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />Page 17 of 28 <br /> <br />10. #16-3822 LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT, 3245 WAYZATA BOULEVARD WEST – <br />PRELIMINARY PLAT/RPUD REZONING/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT <br />(continued) <br /> <br />Walsh stated he likes the wide road, the internal walkway, the views, and the angles. Walsh stated in his <br />view it will be a nice product. Walsh commented he always likes to have wider setbacks but that he can <br />live with the 10-foot separation. <br /> <br />Fretham stated they have spent a lot of time making the plan work and preserving the views. <br /> <br />Levang asked how many different exterior plans there will be. <br /> <br />Fretham stated they are envisioning them to all be custom homes. Fretham stated there will likely be <br />some similar architectural features given the fact that there are 27 homes and that they have submitted <br />some sample floor plans to show that the foundations and building pads will work. Fretham stated they <br />will have some set standards for exterior materials and the front façade. <br /> <br />McMillan requested the applicants put together a list of building standards for the homes and then submit <br />that to Staff. <br /> <br />McMillan noted the review period on this application expires June 3. <br /> <br />Gaffron indicated Staff would ask for an additional 60 days if the application is tabled tonight. Gaffron <br />noted the City is allowed 120 days for the subdivision, which would not expire until August. <br /> <br />McMillan stated it sounds like this application will be back in two weeks. McMillan asked if the City <br />should attempt to nail Hennepin County down on the access point. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated a meeting between Hennepin County, Staff, and the applicant will need to take place. <br /> <br />Campion stated their next step is to try to convince the County why they like this access, and if Hennepin <br />County is not in agreement, they will request they provide some direction on where they would like to <br />have the access. <br /> <br />Wickstrom asked if the Council is comfortable with the setback from the buffer. Wickstrom indicated <br />they have the ability to reduce that buffer by a little bit and make it up elsewhere but that they would like <br />to know if the Council is comfortable as it sits right now. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the buildings would need to be set back ten feet from the buffer so there is the ability to <br />mow and walk around the buildings. Gaffron noted the Park Commission has indicated they would like <br />to obtain a 10-foot easement and the Planning Commission did not make a recommendation on the <br />easement. That easement would impact the site to some extent. In addition, in order to create a <br />topography that is five to ten feet lower than the high points and to create flat building pads, it will be <br />necessary to cut down virtually every tree on the site. If Hennepin County takes another ten feet of right- <br />of-way, the question becomes how that will impact the development. The RPUD standards also require <br />250 feet from the OHWL, which is somewhere between Lots 1 and 2, but Staff and the Planning <br />Commission does not see that as an issue and that some flexibility to the 250 feet will probably need to be <br />given. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.