My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6695
Orono
>
Resolutions, Ordinances, Proclamations
>
Resolutions
>
Reso 0001-7399
>
Reso 6600 - 6699 March 28, 2016 - November 28, 2016)
>
Resolution 6695
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/14/2016 11:50:57 AM
Creation date
12/14/2016 11:50:30 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF ORONO <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />A9. In considering this application for variances, the Council has considered the advice and <br />recommendation of the Planning Commission and the effect of the proposed variances <br />upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic <br />conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect on values <br />of property in the surrounding area. <br />VARIANCE ANALYSIS: <br />Bl. According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />I. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />ordinance is intended to reduce lake impacts (lake yard and structural coverage) and <br />massing (structural coverage and rear yard setbacks). The proposed two story homes <br />presence will be mitigated by the fact the home is fairly secluded, the primary access is <br />via a dead end gravel driveway (which this house is the second from the end) and the <br />adjacent Crystal Bay Road is separated from the improvements with riparian vegetation <br />and steep slopes. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The variance allows the <br />redevelopment of the single family lot, this improvement is consistent with the <br />comprehensive plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The property owner desires to construct a new <br />2,299 square foot home, replacing a 1,781 square foot home on a lot that has <br />approximately 2,400 square feet of buildable area. The planned expansions <br />outside of this area are not out of character with recent variances in the area, <br />notably for the house to the south. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The slope of the lot toward the lake, the location of Crystal Bay Road, and the <br />location of the existing watermain, all influence the buildable area for the lot, <br />none of which was created by the landowner; and <br />c. The variance will not alter the essential character of the locality. Many of the <br />homes in the immediate area require some level of variance to improve the <br />property. The two lots on either side of the subject property have obtained <br />variances over the years. Most recently, the lot to the south received a variance <br />from the lake yard, the average lake, rear yard and lot coverage in 2014. The <br />new home as proposed is 2 story with a ground floor walk out. The home <br />appears to be consistent in scale with the homes on either side, though there are <br />smaller homes in the neighborhood. <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.