Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, November 14, 2016 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />20. #16-3874 STONEWOOD, LLC, ON BEHALF OF LYLE AND GRETCHEN SHAW, 1750 <br />SHADYWOOD ROAD — VARIANCES — RESOLUTION NO. 6694 (continued) <br />Gustafson stated that is the only structure in that area. Gustafson indicated the dashed line is the existing <br />house today, which will be pulled back, and the patio is approximately 10 feet into the average lakeshore <br />setback. <br />Cornick commented he has no issues with the application and that he agrees with the Planning <br />Commission 100 percent. <br />McMillan stated she is in agreement with Council Member Cornick and that the practical difficulties were <br />well reasoned by the Planning Commission. <br />Printup stated quite simply the issue is the 0-75 foot zone. Printup noted the Council has had a number of <br />discussions about allowing boulders and stepping stones in that area. Printup stated while the patio <br />almost makes sense and the house has been relocated out of that area, once the City starts to allow <br />structure or hardcover in the 0-75 foot zone on new construction, it puts the Council in a bad position for <br />the next applicant. <br />Walsh stated he has held fast on anything in the 0-75 foot zone for the past two years. Walsh stated once <br />the patio is approved, it could be converted into a deck, and that it raises the question of where does it end <br />and who gets stuff in the 0-75 foot zone and who does not. Walsh stated he just cannot live with <br />changing his direction on the 0-75 foot zone and that they will have to maneuver things out of that area. <br />Gustafson stated if the architect is able to reconfigure things and pull the northerly side of the house'back, <br />they would not meet the 30 -foot setback from the street. <br />Gaffron noted the house would be approximately 50 to 55 feet from the actual traveled road, and if the <br />house is pushed closer to the street, it would require a variance to the street. <br />McMillan commented a functional driveway is necessary given the traffic on Shadywood Road. <br />Gustafson stated pushing the house forward is a possibility but that he is not sure what it will do to the <br />grade of the driveway. <br />Shaw commented it is always a balancing act and that shortening the driveway will limit guest parking <br />and the ability to turn around. Shaw noted there is no parking allowed on the street. <br />McMillan noted the City has been pretty accommodating to the other houses on the street for that reason. <br />Printup stated he would be interested in seeing what could be done about pulling it back towards the <br />street. <br />Walsh stated the Council could say they will give them everything except for the 0-75 foot setback and <br />that the applicants can come up with a design that fits into that. <br />Gustafson asked whether a variance to the 30 -foot street setback is something the Council would <br />consider. <br />Page 20 of 28 <br />